Abstract:Symbolic numeracy first emerges as children learn the meanings of number words and how to use them to precisely count sets of objects. This development starts before children enter school and forms a foundation for lifelong mathematics achievement. Despite its importance, exactly how children acquire this basic knowledge is unclear. Here we test competing theories of early number learning by measuring event-related brain potentials during a novel number word-quantity comparison task in 3-4-year-old preschool children (N = 128). We find several qualitative differences in neural processing of number by conceptual stage of development. Specifically, we find differences in early attention-related parietal electrophysiology (N1), suggesting that less conceptually advanced children process arrays as individual objects and more advanced children distribute attention over the entire set. Subsequently, we find that only more conceptually advanced children show later-going frontal (N2) sensitivity to the numerical-distance relationship between the number word and visual quantity. The nature of this response suggested that exact rather than approximate numerical meanings were being associated with number words over frontal sites. No evidence of numerical distance effects was observed over posterior scalp sites. Together these results suggest that children may engage parallel individuation of objects to learn the meanings of the first few number words, but, ultimately, create new exact cardinal value representations for number words that cannot be defined in terms of core, nonverbal number systems. More broadly, these results document an interaction between attentional and general cognitive mechanisms in cognitive development. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Conceptual development in numeracy is associated with a shift in attention from objects to sets. Children acquire meanings of the first few number words through associations with parallel attentional individuation of objects. Understanding of cardinality is associated with attentional processing of sets rather than individuals. Brain signatures suggest children attribute exact rather than approximate numerical meanings to the first few number words. Number-quantity relationship processing for the first few number words is evident in frontal but not parietal scalp electrophysiology of young children.

Prefrontal cortex and the evolution of symbolic reference

Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain

Neuroethology of number sense across the animal kingdom

Creating something out of nothing: Symbolic and non-symbolic representations of numerical zero in the human brain

Sequential neuronal processing of number values, abstract decision, and action in the primate prefrontal cortex

Neural evidence of core foundations and conceptual change in preschool numeracy

The Evolution of Symbolic Thought: At the Intersection of Schizophrenia Psychopathology, Ethnoarchaeology, and Neuroscience

Challenging the neurobiological link between number sense and symbolic numerical abilities

A neural model of how the brain represents and compares multi-digit numbers: spatial and categorical processes

Design for a Darwinian Brain: Part 1. Philosophy and Neuroscience

Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children

Neurosymbolic AI -- Why, What, and How

Using cognitive training studies to unravel the mechanisms by which the approximate number system supports symbolic math ability

Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: evidence from brain and behavior

Neuron numbers link innovativeness with both absolute and relative brain size in birds

The Language–Number Interface in the Brain: A Complex Parametric Study of Quantifiers and Quantities

Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (Why, What, and How)

The Calculating Brain

No relative expansion of the number of prefrontal neurons in primate and human evolution

The Faculty of Language Integrates the Two Core Systems of Number

Neural representational similarity between symbolic and non‐symbolic quantities predicts arithmetic skills in childhood but not adolescence