Influence of irreversible demagnetization on the polarization of thermal radiation emitted by a hot cobalt wire

A. F. Borghesani,M. Guarise,G. Carugno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.09736

2019-12-20

Abstract:thermal radiation emitted by a %hot cobalt wire in the temperature range from \(T\approx 400\,\)K up to melting. The radiation is linearly polarized perpendicular to the wire. \(P\) decreases from \(30\,\%\) just above room temperature down to \(6.5\,\%\) near melting and does not show any particular behavior neither at the martensitic {\em hcp}$-${\em fcc} transition at \(\approx 700\,\)K nor at the Curie point at \( \approx 1400\,\)K. However, \(P\) shows a rapid decrease for \(T\gtrsim 1000\,\)K and, contrary to previous measurements with tungsten wires, it hysteretically behaves if the temperature change is reversed. This behavior is rationalized by %taking into account accounting for the irreversible thermal demagnetization of the wire with magnetic domain size change.

Materials Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **The polarization characteristics of the thermal radiation of cobalt wire at high temperature and its relationship with the irreversible demagnetization phenomenon**.

Specifically, the author studied the effect of increasing temperature on the linear polarization degree \(P\) of the thermal radiation emitted by the cobalt wire. The experiment found that as the temperature increased, the polarization degree \(P\) of the cobalt wire gradually decreased from about 30% to 6.5% near the melting point, and showed obvious hysteresis behavior when the temperature change was reversed. This behavior is different from the previous research results on tungsten wire and is related to the irreversible thermal demagnetization process of the cobalt wire.

### Main problems and findings:

1. **Change of polarization degree with temperature**:
- The polarization degree \(P\) of the cobalt wire decreased significantly when the temperature rose from 400K to near the melting point.
- At about 1100K, the polarization degree \(P\) dropped sharply and showed a hysteresis phenomenon during the cooling process.

2. **Effect of irreversible demagnetization**:
- The paper proposes that the change in polarization degree may be caused by the irreversible thermal demagnetization of the magnetic domain structure inside the cobalt wire.
- As the temperature rises, the movement of the magnetic domain wall (DW) intensifies, resulting in a decrease in the magnetic domain size, which in turn affects the spatial range of the collective electron fluctuation and finally leads to a decrease in the polarization degree.

3. **Comparison between theoretical model and experiment**:
- Theoretically, for a homogeneous material, the polarization degree \(P\) can be predicted by calculating the absorption efficiency of the cylinder for different modes (TE and TM).
- The experimental results show that the actually measured polarization degree \(P\) is significantly lower than the theoretically predicted value, especially at higher temperatures.

4. **Significance of macroscopic optical measurement**:
- Through macroscopic optical measurement, the evolution of the magnetic domain structure of magnetic materials at different temperatures can be revealed.
- This method provides macroscopic information about the magnetic properties of materials, although it cannot directly reveal the microscopic structure details.

### Formula summary:

- The definition of the polarization degree \(P\) is:
\[
P=\frac{v_p}{2v_u + v_p}
\]
where \(v_u\) and \(v_p\) are the contributions of the unpolarized and polarized radiation components respectively.

- The calculation formula of the absorption efficiency \(Q_{\text{abs}}\) is:
\[
P(T, R)=\frac{\langle Q_{\perp}^{\text{abs}}\rangle-\langle Q_{\parallel}^{\text{abs}}\rangle}{\langle Q_{\perp}^{\text{abs}}\rangle+\langle Q_{\parallel}^{\text{abs}}\rangle}
\]
where:
\[
\langle Q_{\dagger}^{\text{abs}}\rangle=\frac{1}{F}\int D(\lambda)B(\lambda, T)Q_{\dagger}^{\text{abs}}(\lambda, T, R)d\lambda
\]
\(B(\lambda, T)\) is the Planck distribution, \(D(\lambda)\) is the detector response function, and the normalization factor \(F = \int D(\lambda)B(\lambda, T)d\lambda\).

In conclusion, this paper aims to reveal the irreversible demagnetization phenomenon of cobalt wire and its influence on the magnetic domain structure by studying the polarization characteristics of the thermal radiation of cobalt wire at high temperature.