Abstract:BackgroundEvolutionary histories can be discordant across the genome, and such discordances need to be considered in reconstructing the species phylogeny. ASTRAL is one of the leading methods for inferring species trees from gene trees while accounting for gene tree discordance. ASTRAL uses dynamic programming to search for the tree that shares the maximum number of quartet topologies with input gene trees, restricting itself to a predefined set of bipartitions.ResultsWe introduce ASTRAL-III, which substantially improves the running time of ASTRAL-II and guarantees polynomial running time as a function of both the number of species (n) and the number of genes (k). ASTRAL-III limits the bipartition constraint set (X) to grow at most linearly with n and k. Moreover, it handles polytomies more efficiently than ASTRAL-II, exploits similarities between gene trees better, and uses several techniques to avoid searching parts of the search space that are mathematically guaranteed not to include the optimal tree. The asymptotic running time of ASTRAL-III in the presence of polytomies is O(nk)1.726D\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$O\left ((nk)^{1.726} D \right)$\end{document} where D=O(nk) is the sum of degrees of all unique nodes in input trees. The running time improvements enable us to test whether contracting low support branches in gene trees improves the accuracy by reducing noise. In extensive simulations, we show that removing branches with very low support (e.g., below 10%) improves accuracy while overly aggressive filtering is harmful. We observe on a biological avian phylogenomic dataset of 14K genes that contracting low support branches greatly improve results.ConclusionsASTRAL-III is a faster version of the ASTRAL method for phylogenetic reconstruction and can scale up to 10,000 species. With ASTRAL-III, low support branches can be removed, resulting in improved accuracy.

Listing Conflicting Triples in Optimal Time

Computing Rooted and Unrooted Maximum Consistent Supertrees

Unifying Parsimonious Tree Reconciliation

A Faster Construction of Greedy Consensus Trees

ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees

Computing the probability of gene trees concordant with the species tree in the multispecies coalescent

Exact reconciliation of undated trees

Identifying Duplications and Lateral Gene Transfers Simultaneously and Rapidly

Convex Characters, Algorithms, and Matchings

Branch Length Transforms using Optimal Tree Metric Matching

Novel Algorithm for Comparing Phylogenetic Trees with Different but Overlapping Taxa

Forbidden Time Travel: Characterization of Time-Consistent Tree Reconciliation Maps

Relative Timing Information and Orthology in Evolutionary Scenarios

A complete characterization of pairs of binary phylogenetic trees with identical $A_k$-alignments

Defining phylogenetic relationships: a complete and minimal set of combinatorial properties for triplets

On the correctness of Maximum Parsimony for data with few substitutions in the NNI neighborhood of phylogenetic trees

Reconciliation of Gene and Species Trees With Polytomies

An Improved Algorithm for the Maximum Agreement Subtree Problem

A New Paradigm for Identifying Reconciliation-Scenario Altering Mutations Conferring Environmental Adaptation

Enumeration of ancestral configurations for matching gene trees and species trees

Ranked Subtree Prune and Regraft