Abstract:Every computer system -- from schedulers in clouds (e.g. Amazon) to computer networks to operating systems -- performs resource allocation across system users. The defacto allocation policies are max-min fairness (MMF) for single resources and dominant resource fairness (DRF) for multiple resources which guarantee properties like incentive compatibility, envy-freeness, and Pareto efficiency, assuming user demands are static (time-independent). However, in real-world systems, user demands are dynamic, i.e. time-dependant. As a result, there is now a fundamental mismatch between the goals of computer systems and the properties enabled by classic resource allocation policies. We aim to bridge this mismatch. When demands are dynamic, instant-by-instant MMF can be extremely unfair over longer periods of time, i.e. lead to unbalanced user allocations as previous allocations have no effect in the present. We consider a natural generalization of MMF and DRF for multiple resources and users with dynamic demands: this algorithm ensures that user allocations are as max-min fair as possible up to any time instant, given past allocations. This dynamic mechanism remains Pareto optimal and envy-free, but not incentive compatible. However, our results show that the possible increase in utility by misreporting is bounded and, since this can lead to significant decrease in overall useful allocation, this suggests that it is not a useful strategy. Our main result is to show that our dynamic DRF algorithm is $(1+\rho)$-incentive compatible, where $\rho$ quantifies the relative importance of a resource for different users; we show that this factor is tight even with only two resources. We also present a $3/2$ upper bound and a $\sqrt 2$ lower bound for incentive compatibility when there is only one resource. We also offer extensions for the case when users are weighted to prioritize them differently.

Revenue allocation in Formula One: a pairwise comparison approach

A comparative study of scoring systems by simulations

Hint of a Universal Law for the Financial Gains of Competitive Sport Teams. The Case of Tour de France Cycle Race

A General Framework for Fair Allocation under Matroid Rank Valuations

On the Connection between Individual Scaled Vickrey Payments and the Egalitarian Allocation

Prize-allocation rules in generalized team contests

Ranking by pairwise comparisons for Swiss-system tournaments

Tournament schedules and incentives in a double round-robin tournament with four teams

The allocation of FIFA World Cup slots based on the ranking of confederations

Settling the Score: Portioning with Cardinal Preferences

How Should We Score Athletes and Candidates: Geometric Scoring Rules

Yankee Swap: a Fast and Simple Fair Allocation Mechanism for Matroid Rank Valuations

Bayesian Analysis of Formula One Race Results: Disentangling Driver Skill and Constructor Advantage

The common revenue allocation based on modified Shapley value and DEA cross-efficiency

Universal scaling in sports ranking

Price of Fairness for Allocating a Bounded Resource

Talent Allocation in European Football Leagues: Why Competitive Imbalance May be optimal?

Random matching in balanced bipartite graphs: The (un)fairness of draw mechanisms used in sports

Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation under Dynamic Demands

Fans Economy and All-Pay Auctions with Proportional Allocations.

Faster identification of faster Formula 1 drivers via time-rank duality