Abstract:When fitting cosmological models to data, a Bayesian framework is commonly used, requiring assumptions on the form of the likelihood and model prior. In light of current tensions between different data, it is interesting to investigate the robustness of cosmological measurements to statistical assumptions about the likelihood distribution from which the data was drawn. We consider the impact of changes to the likelihood caused by uncertainties due to the finite number of mock catalogs used to estimate the covariance matrix, leading to the replacement of the standard Gaussian likelihood with a multivariate $t$-distribution. These changes to the likelihood have a negligible impact on recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements. We then extend our analysis to perform a sensitivity test on the Gaussian likelihoods typically adopted, considering how increasing the size of the tails of the likelihood (again using a $t$-distribution) affects cosmological inferences. For an open $\Lambda$CDM model constrained by BAO alone, we find that increasing the weight in the tails shifts and broadens the resulting posterior on the parameters, with a $\sim$0.2-0.4$\sigma$ effect on $\Omega_\Lambda$ and $\Omega_{\rm k}$. In contrast, the CMB temperature and polarization constraints in $\Lambda$CDM showed less than 0.03$\sigma$ changes in the parameters, except for $\{\tau$, ln($10^{10}A_{\rm s})$, $\sigma_8$, $S_8$, $\sigma_8\Omega_{\rm m}^{0.25}$, $z_{\rm re}$, $10^9A_{\rm s}e^{-2\tau}\}$ which shifted by around 0.1-0.2$\sigma$. If we use solely $\ell < 30$ data, the amplitude $A_{\rm s} e^{-2\tau}$ varies in the posterior mean by 0.7$\sigma$ and the error bars increase by 6%. We conclude, at least for current-generation CMB and BAO measurements, that uncertainties in the shape and tails of the likelihood do not contribute to current tensions.

A Bayesian interpretation of inconsistency measures in cosmology

Tensions in cosmology: a discussion of statistical tools to determine inconsistencies

Bayesian distances for quantifying tensions in cosmological inference and the surprise statistic

A Bayesian quantification of consistency in correlated datasets

Inconsistency and Acausality in Bayesian Inference for Physical Problems

On the consistency of $Λ$CDM with CMB measurements in light of the latest Planck, ACT, and SPT data

Matching Bayesian and frequentist coverage probabilities when using an approximate data covariance matrix

Bayesian reasoning in cosmology

Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection

On dataset tensions and signatures of new cosmological physics

Bayesian model comparison in cosmology with Population Monte Carlo

Probing the Consistency of Cosmological Contours for Supernova Cosmology

Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in $Ω_m$ and $H_0$ Across Cosmological Probes

Cosmological measurements from the CMB and BAO are insensitive to the tail probability in the assumed likelihood

Ensuring Consistency between Noise and Detection in Hierarchical Bayesian Inference

The consistency test on the cosmic evolution

Implications of bias evolution on measurements of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: errors and biases in parameter estimation

Frequentist Estimation of Cosmological Parameters from the MAXIMA-1 Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Data

Testing the consistency of early and late cosmological parameters with BAO and CMB data