Frequentist Estimation of Cosmological Parameters from the MAXIMA-1 Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Data

M.E. Abroe,A. Balbi,J. Borrill,E.F. Bunn,P.G. Ferreira,S. Hanany,A.H. Jaffe,A.T. Lee,K.A. Olive,B. Rabii,P.L. Richards,G.F. Smoot,R. Stompor,C.D. Winant,J.H.P. Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05383.x

2002-07-10

Abstract:We use a frequentist statistical approach to set confidence intervals on the values of cosmological parameters using the MAXIMA-1 and COBE measurements of the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background. We define a $\Delta \chi^{2}$ statistic, simulate the measurements of MAXIMA-1 and COBE, determine the probability distribution of the statistic, and use it and the data to set confidence intervals on several cosmological parameters. We compare the frequentist confidence intervals to Bayesian credible regions. The frequentist and Bayesian approaches give best estimates for the parameters that agree within 15%, and confidence interval-widths that agree within 30%. The results also suggest that a frequentist analysis gives slightly broader confidence intervals than a Bayesian analysis. The frequentist analysis gives values of \Omega=0.89{+0.26\atop -0.19}, \Omega_{\rm B}h^2=0.026{+0.020\atop -0.011} and n=1.02{+0.31\atop -0.10}, and the Bayesian analysis gives values of \Omega=0.98{+0.14\atop -0.19}, \Omega_{\rm B}h^2=0.0.029{+0.015\atop-0.010}, and $n=1.18{+0.10\atop -0.23}$, all at the 95% confidence level.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to use the frequency - statistical method to estimate cosmological parameters and set the confidence intervals of these parameters through the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data measured by MAXIMA - 1 and COBE. Specifically:

1. **Problem Background**:
- The angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) depends on the parameters that describe the initial and evolutionary characteristics of the universe.
- Accurate measurement of the power spectrum can provide strong constraints on these parameters.

2. **Research Purposes**:
- Use the Frequentist approach to set the confidence intervals of cosmological parameters.
- By defining a \(\Delta\chi^2\) statistic, simulate the measurements of MAXIMA - 1 and COBE, determine the probability distribution of this statistic, and use it and the actual data to set the confidence intervals.
- Compare the confidence intervals obtained by the frequency - statistical method with the credible intervals obtained by the Bayesian method.

3. **Key Formulas**:
- The \(\chi^2\) statistic is defined as:
\[
\chi^2=\sum_{i,j}(Z_d^i - Z_t^i)M_{ij}(Z_d^j - Z_t^j)+\frac{(u - 1)^2}{\sigma_u^2}
\]
where
\[
Z_t^i=\ln(NC_t^i+x_i),\quad Z_d^i=\ln(uC_d^i+x_i)
\]
\(C_d^i\) and \(C_t^i\) represent the observed and theoretical band powers respectively, \(M_{ij}\) is the inverse of the covariance matrix, \(N\) is the model normalization factor, \(u\) is the calibration factor, and \(\sigma_u\) is the calibration uncertainty.

4. **Main Results**:
- The best estimates given by the frequency - statistical method and the Bayesian method are consistent within 15%, and the widths of the confidence intervals are consistent within 30%.
- The confidence intervals given by the frequency - statistical method are slightly wider than those given by the Bayesian method.

In conclusion, this paper aims to analyze CMB data by the frequency - statistical method to obtain cosmological parameter estimates that are more independent of prior assumptions, and compare with the Bayesian method to verify the consistency and differences between the two methods.