Abstract:Motivation Appropriately taxing the richest is a priority for African governments which need tax revenues to invest and pay for public services. In Uganda, the revenue authority launched a unit in 2015 to monitor the tax affairs of high net‐worth individuals (HNWIs) and very important people (VIPs), 393 persons in all. The unit combined persuasion, assistance, and enforcement. Purpose Was the unit able to improve tax compliance by the rich? Methods and approach In collaboration with the Uganda Revenue Authority, this study builds on taxpayer‐level data on tax filing and payment. The analysis employs a standard difference‐in‐difference framework, exploiting the timing of the launch of the unit (September 2015). It also makes use of the existence of the target group of 393 wealthy and a group of another 1,731 potential wealthy who have been identified but never included in the unit's operations owing to limited resources. We match the groups using a propensity score algorithm. Findings The unit has been only partly successful. While the unit increased the probability of filing a return, especially by VIPs, taxpayers declared less on different measures, with no impacts on tax liability. On tax payments, only a small and significant positive impact was found, again due to complex offsetting responses across tax categories. This study also measures the spillover effect on companies controlled by the richest: again documenting complex compensating reactions and no meaningful impacts on tax take. Lastly, while deterrence is more effective for HNWIs, taxpayer assistance and public shaming are more relevant for VIPs. Policy implications This case shows the rich can be identified and their tax monitored. It also shows the limits of what can be achieved. The Uganda unit lacked staff: it needed twice as many persons to monitor the tax of wealthy persons adequately. Moreover, it was hamstrung by the difficulties of sharing data between different departments of the Tax Authority, among government agencies, and between government and key agents such as banks. Ultimately the unit did not have the staff and data to challenge the tax avoidance schemes deployed by wealthy people and the companies they own.

Taxing dissent: The impact of a social media tax in Uganda

Technology and the state: Building capacity to tax via text

Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest

Taxpayer response to greater progressivity: evidence from personal income tax reform in Uganda

International taxation sentiment and COVID-19 crisis

Impact of Tax Compliance Enforcement Initiatives in Uganda: case Study of the Value-Added Tax Fraud Campaign

The Impact of Information Interventions on Public Opinion on Social Media Regulation: Evidence from a Survey on Twitter’s Trump Ban

The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on social and economic welfare in Uganda

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NORMS IN TAX COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOUR OF SMES IN EMERGING ECONOMIES LIKE UGANDA

Global Spillovers of Taxation in the Online Advertising Market. Theory and Evidence from Facebook

Does cigarette demand respond to price increases in Uganda? Price elasticity estimates using the Uganda National Panel Survey and Deaton’s method

The challenges of taxation in the digital economy: analysis of the Ecuadorian tax system

The Economics of Content Moderation: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Hate Speech on Twitter

The Unequal Economic and Livelihood Impacts of COVID-19 Lockdowns: Qualitative Evidence from Uganda

Effects of restricting social media usage on wellbeing and performance: A randomized control trial among students.

News consumption and social media regulations policy

Quasi-experimental Designs for Assessing Response on Social Media to Policy Changes

Industry 4.0 in Financial Services: Mobile Money Taxes, Revenue Mobilisation, Financial Inclusion, and the Realisation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Africa

The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in Ecuador: An analysis across different income and consumption groups

How to improve tax compliance by wealthy persons? Evidence from Uganda

Taxing the Digital Economy through Consumption Taxes (VAT) in African Countries: Possibilities, Constraints and Implications