Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

An Email Experiment to Identify the Effect of Racial Discrimination on Access to Lawyers: A Statistical Approach

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement

Racial Discrimination and Administrative Burden in Access to Public Services

A Causal Framework to Evaluate Racial Bias in Law Enforcement Systems

A Causal Framework for Observational Studies of Discrimination

Racial Minorities Face Discrimination From Across the Political Spectrum When Seeking to Form Ties on Social Media: Evidence From a Field Experiment

Measuring Racial Discrimination in Bail Decisions

Racial Profiling, Statistical Discrimination, and the Effect of a Colorblind Policy on the Crime Rate

Detecting Racial Bias in Jury Selection

Perceiving Discrimination: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in the Legal Workplace

A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithms

Mitigating Included- and Omitted-Variable Bias in Estimates of Disparate Impact

LinkedOut? A Field Experiment on Discrimination in Job Network Formation

Blinding prosecutors to defendants’ race: A policy proposal to reduce unconscious bias in the criminal justice system

Algorithms that "Don't See Color": Comparing Biases in Lookalike and Special Ad Audiences

A note on post-treatment selection in studying racial discrimination in policing

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Income Inequality and White-on-Black Racial Bias in the United States: Evidence From Project Implicit and Google Trends

Rationally Inattentive Statistical Discrimination: Arrow Meets Phelps

Breaking Bias, Building Bridges: Evaluation and Mitigation of Social Biases in LLMs via Contact Hypothesis

Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Optimal Transport and Conformal Prediction Sets