Abstract:Epistemic modals have peculiar logical features that are challenging to account for in a broadly classical framework. For instance, while a sentence of the form $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ ('$p$, but it might be that not $p$') appears to be a contradiction, $\Diamond\neg p$ does not entail $\neg p$, which would follow in classical logic. Likewise, the classical laws of distributivity and disjunctive syllogism fail for epistemic modals. Existing attempts to account for these facts generally either under- or over-correct. Some predict that $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$, a so-called epistemic contradiction, is a contradiction only in an etiolated sense, under a notion of entailment that does not always allow us to replace $p\wedge\Diamond\neg p$ with a contradiction; these theories underpredict the infelicity of embedded epistemic contradictions. Other theories savage classical logic, eliminating not just rules that intuitively fail but also rules like non-contradiction, excluded middle, De Morgan's laws, and disjunction introduction, which intuitively remain valid for epistemic modals. In this paper, we aim for a middle ground, developing a semantics and logic for epistemic modals that makes epistemic contradictions genuine contradictions and that invalidates distributivity and disjunctive syllogism but that otherwise preserves classical laws that intuitively remain valid. We start with an algebraic semantics, based on ortholattices instead of Boolean algebras, and then propose a more concrete possibility semantics, based on partial possibilities related by compatibility. Both semantics yield the same consequence relation, which we axiomatize. We then show how to lift an arbitrary possible worlds model for a non-modal language to a possibility model for a language with epistemic modals.

About epistemic negation and world views in Epistemic Logic Programs

Epistemic Logic Programs: A Study of Some Properties

Founded World Views with Autoepistemic Equilibrium Logic

On the Correspondence of Non-flat Assumption-based Argumentation and Logic Programming with Negation as Failure in the Head

The Orthologic of Epistemic Modals

A Constructive Epistemic Logic with Public Announcement (Non-Predetermined Possibilities)

Three-valued and four-valued approach to logic programming with negation

A note on the Declarative reading(s) of Logic Programming

Hidden protocols: Modifying our expectations in an evolving world

Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation

An Argumentation-Based Framework for Extended Disjunctive Logic Programs

Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set Programming

Agent-Knowledge Logic for Alternative Epistemic Logic

An Acceptance Semantics for Stable Modal Knowledge

LP2PB: Translating Answer Set Programs into Pseudo-Boolean Theories

Problems in Epistemic Space

Enablers and Inhibitors in Causal Justifications of Logic Programs

Reasoning about Knowledge and Strategies: Epistemic Strategy Logic

Epistemic Graphs for Representing and Reasoning with Positive and Negative Influences of Arguments

A Survey of the Proof-Theoretic Foundations of Logic Programming

Possible Worlds Semantics: A Research Program That Cannot Fail?