Machine Learning and Visualization in Clinical Decision Support: Current State and Future Directions

Gal Levy-Fix,Gilad J. Kuperman,Noémie Elhadad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.02664
2019-06-07
Abstract:Deep learning, an area of machine learning, is set to revolutionize patient care. But it is not yet part of standard of care, especially when it comes to individual patient care. In fact, it is unclear to what extent data-driven techniques are being used to support clinical decision making (CDS). Heretofore, there has not been a review of ways in which research in machine learning and other types of data-driven techniques can contribute effectively to clinical care and the types of support they can bring to clinicians. In this paper, we consider ways in which two data driven domains - machine learning and data visualizations - can contribute to the next generation of clinical decision support systems. We review the literature regarding the ways heuristic knowledge, machine learning, and visualization are - and can be - applied to three types of CDS. There has been substantial research into the use of predictive modeling for alerts, however current CDS systems are not utilizing these methods. Approaches that leverage interactive visualizations and machine-learning inferences to organize and review patient data are gaining popularity but are still at the prototype stage and are not yet in use. CDS systems that could benefit from prescriptive machine learning (e.g., treatment recommendations for specific patients) have not yet been developed. We discuss potential reasons for the lack of deployment of data-driven methods in CDS and directions for future research.
Machine Learning,Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is that current Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems have failed to fully utilize data - driven technologies (such as machine learning and data visualization) to effectively support individualized patient care. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Status Quo Analysis**: Current CDS systems have not fully integrated data - driven methods, especially deep learning and other types of machine - learning techniques, as well as data visualization methods. Although these techniques can theoretically significantly improve the performance of CDS systems, they have not been widely adopted in practical applications. 2. **Application Areas**: The paper explores how to apply machine learning and data visualization to three main types of CDS: - **Infobuttons**: Assist doctors in retrieving external resources related to patients, such as scientific literature and guidelines. - **Content Aggregation and Organization (CAO)**: Reorganize and present patient information so that doctors can better understand and make decisions. - **Alerts**: Provide early warnings, reminders or recommendations to guide doctors to take actions and prevent medical errors. 3. **Research Gaps and Future Directions**: The paper points out several key problems in current CDS systems and proposes future research directions: - **Lack of Personalization**: Existing CDS systems are not patient - specific enough and cannot provide customized suggestions according to the specific situation of each patient. - **Simple Logic**: Many CDS systems rely on simple rule - based logic and lack the ability to recognize complex patterns. - **Poor Generalization**: Existing systems are difficult to apply to different types of patients and clinical situations. - **Human - Machine Interaction Problems**: Existing systems have not fully considered user experience and human factors engineering issues. By combining machine learning and data visualization, the paper believes that the above challenges can be overcome, thereby achieving more personalized, high - quality, safe and efficient clinical decision - support systems. In addition, the paper also emphasizes the need for further research on the practicality and performance evaluation of these technologies in the actual clinical environment. ### Key Formulas Although this paper is mainly of a review nature and involves fewer technical details using specific formulas, in order to ensure the correctness and readability of the formulas, the following are the formula representations of some basic concepts that may be involved: - **Bayes' Theorem** (used for diagnostic prediction): \[ P(A|B)=\frac{P(B|A)\cdot P(A)}{P(B)} \] where \(P(A|B)\) represents the probability of event \(A\) occurring under the condition of observing event \(B\). - **Linear Regression Model** (used for prediction tasks): \[ y = \beta_0+\beta_1x_1+\beta_2x_2+\cdots+\beta_nx_n+\epsilon \] where \(y\) is the target variable, \(x_i\) is the feature variable, \(\beta_i\) is the regression coefficient, and \(\epsilon\) is the error term. - **Clustering Algorithm (such as K - means)**: \[ \min_{S}\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\sum_{x_j\in S_i}\|x_j-\mu_i\|^2 \] where \(S_i\) is the \(i\) - th cluster, \(\mu_i\) is the center point of the cluster, and \(\|x_j-\mu_i\|\) is the distance from the sample point \(x_j\) to the cluster center. Through the application of these technologies, the paper hopes to promote the development of clinical decision - support systems so that they can better serve modern medical needs.