Abstract:Starting from a symmetrical multiple choice individual I build a sociophysics model of decision making. Reducing the choices to two and interactions to pairs recover the Ising model from physics at zero temperature. The associated equilibrium state is a spontaneous symmetry breaking with the whole group sharing a unique choice selected at random. However, my focus departs from physics, which aims at identifying the true equilibrium state discarding any possible impact of the initial conditions, the size of the sample and the used update algorithm. Any memory of the past history is erased. In contrast, I claim that dealing with a social system, the history of the system must be taken into account in identifying the relevant social equilibrium state. Using Monte Carlo simulations I explore the spectrum of non universal equilibrium states of the Ising model at zero temperature. I show that different initial conditions with the same value of the order parameter lead to different equilibrium states. The same applies for different sizes and different update algorithms. The results indicate that in the presence of a social network composed of agents sharing different initial opinions, it is their interactions that lead them to share a unique choice and not their mere membership in the network. This finding sheds a new light on the emergence of echo chambers, which appear to be the end of a dynamical process of opinion update and not its beginning with a preferential attachment. Furthermore, polarization is obtained as a side effect of the random selection of the respective unanimous choices of the various echo chambers within a social community. The study points to social media exchange algorithms, which are purely technical levers independent of the issue and opinions at stake, to tackle polarization by either hindering or accelerating the completion of symmetry breaking between agents.

Phase Transition in Democratic Opinion Dynamics

Phase transition in the Galam's majority-rule model with information-mediated independence

Phase transitions in a two parameter model of opinion dynamics with random kinetic exchanges

Non-equilibrium phase transition in negotiation dynamics

Phase transition in the majority rule model with the nonconformist agents

Phase coexistence in the fully heterogeneous Hegselmann–Krause opinion dynamics model

Minority Opinion Spreading in Random Geometry

Models of Opinion Dynamics with Random Parametrisation

Consensus and clustering in opinion formation on networks

PERCOLATION AND GALAM THEORY OF MINORITY OPINION SPREADING

Asymmetric Contrarians in Opinion Dynamics

When Pull Turns to Shove: A Continuous-Time Model for Opinion Dynamics

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 1. Echo Chambers and Random Polarization

A modified Hegselmann-Krause model for interacting voters and political parties

Opinion Dynamics and Collective Decisions

$N$-player game formulation of the majority-vote model of opinion dynamics

The dynamics of opinion expression

Contrarian Majority rule model with external oscillating propaganda and individual inertias

Phase transition and universality of the majority-rule model on complex networks

Critical phenomena in the spreading of opinion consensus and disagreement

The undecided have the key: Interaction-driven opinion dynamics in a three state model