Abstract:Summary Operational earthquake forecasting for risk management and communication during seismic sequences depends on our ability to select an optimal forecasting model. To do this, we need to compare the performance of competing models in prospective experiments, and to rank their performance according to the outcome using a fair, reproducible, and reliable method, usually in a low-probability environment. The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) conducts prospective earthquake forecasting experiments around the globe. In this framework, it is crucial that the metrics employed to rank the competing forecasts are ‘proper’, meaning that, on average, they prefer the data generating model. We prove that the Parimutuel Gambling score, proposed, and in some cases applied, as a metric for comparing probabilistic seismicity forecasts, is in general ‘improper’. In the special case where it is proper, we show it can still be used improperly. We demonstrate the conclusions both analytically and graphically providing a set of simulation based techniques that can be used to assess if a score is proper or not. They only require a data generating model and, at least two forecasts to be compared. We compare the Parimutuel Gambling score’s performance with two commonly-used proper scores (the Brier and logarithmic scores) using confidence intervals to account for the uncertainty around the observed score difference. We suggest that using confidence intervals enables a rigorous approach to distinguish between the predictive skills of candidate forecasts, in addition to their rankings. Our analysis shows that the Parimutuel Gambling score is biased, and the direction of the bias depends on the forecasts taking part in the experiment. Our findings suggest the Parimutuel Gambling score should not be used to distinguishing between multiple competing forecasts, and for care to be taken in the case where only two are being compared.

Why do some probabilistic forecasts lack reliability?

Regions of Reliability in the Evaluation of Multivariate Probabilistic Forecasts

A Practical Probabilistic Benchmark for AI Weather Models

Beyond Strictly Proper Scoring Rules: The Importance of Being Local

On the generation of probabilistic forecasts from deterministic models

Ranking earthquake forecasts using proper scoring rules: Binary events in a low probability environment

A User-Focused Approach to Evaluating Probabilistic and Categorical Forecasts

Evaluating probabilistic classifiers: Reliability diagrams and score decompositions revisited

Non-probabilistic odds and forecasting with imperfect models

Probabilistic Forecasting of Photovoltaic Generation: an Efficient Statistical Approach

Probabilistic Versus Deterministic Potential Seasonal Climate Predictability under the Perfect-Model Framework

Probabilistic recalibration of forecasts

Evaluating probabilistic forecasts of extremes using continuous ranked probability score distributions

Data-Driven Day-ahead Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Power Based on Features Sensitivity Analysis and Meteorological Scenario Classification

Hybrid Probabilistic Forecasting of Photovoltaic Power Generation Considering Weather Conditions

Evaluation of probabilistic forecasts of binary events with the Neighborhood Brier Divergence Skill Score

A theoretical relationship between probabilistic relative operating characteristic skill and deterministic correlation skill in dynamical seasonal climate prediction

Uniform reliability tests for forecasting systems with small lead time

Scoring Rules and Calibration for Imprecise Probabilities

On the Relationship Between Probabilistic and Deterministic Skills in Dynamical Seasonal Climate Prediction

Probabilistic solar forecasting: Benchmarks, post-processing, verification