Abstract:Summary Operational earthquake forecasting for risk management and communication during seismic sequences depends on our ability to select an optimal forecasting model. To do this, we need to compare the performance of competing models in prospective experiments, and to rank their performance according to the outcome using a fair, reproducible, and reliable method, usually in a low-probability environment. The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) conducts prospective earthquake forecasting experiments around the globe. In this framework, it is crucial that the metrics employed to rank the competing forecasts are ‘proper’, meaning that, on average, they prefer the data generating model. We prove that the Parimutuel Gambling score, proposed, and in some cases applied, as a metric for comparing probabilistic seismicity forecasts, is in general ‘improper’. In the special case where it is proper, we show it can still be used improperly. We demonstrate the conclusions both analytically and graphically providing a set of simulation based techniques that can be used to assess if a score is proper or not. They only require a data generating model and, at least two forecasts to be compared. We compare the Parimutuel Gambling score’s performance with two commonly-used proper scores (the Brier and logarithmic scores) using confidence intervals to account for the uncertainty around the observed score difference. We suggest that using confidence intervals enables a rigorous approach to distinguish between the predictive skills of candidate forecasts, in addition to their rankings. Our analysis shows that the Parimutuel Gambling score is biased, and the direction of the bias depends on the forecasts taking part in the experiment. Our findings suggest the Parimutuel Gambling score should not be used to distinguishing between multiple competing forecasts, and for care to be taken in the case where only two are being compared.

Non-probabilistic odds and forecasting with imperfect models

Improving Probability Estimation Through Active Probabilistic Model Learning.

On the Statistical Differences between Binary Forecasts and Real World Payoffs

Probabilistic recalibration of forecasts

MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS Bayesian Logistic Betting Strategy Against Probability Forecasting

Bayesian logistic betting strategy against probability forecasting

A User-Focused Approach to Evaluating Probabilistic and Categorical Forecasts

On the generation of probabilistic forecasts from deterministic models

Gambling under unknown probabilities as a proxy for real world decisions under uncertainty

Kelly Betting on Horse Races with Uncertainty in Probability Estimates

Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasts for Arbitrary Sequences

Infinitely Stochastic Micro Forecasting

Probabilistic Short-term Wind Forecasting Based on Pinball Loss Optimization

Optimal probabilistic forecasts for risk management

Ranking earthquake forecasts using proper scoring rules: Binary events in a low probability environment

Decision making with dynamic probabilistic forecasts

Creating Probabilistic Forecasts from Arbitrary Deterministic Forecasts using Conditional Invertible Neural Networks

Forecasting Binary Outcomes

Scoring Rules and Calibration for Imprecise Probabilities

A Practical Probabilistic Benchmark for AI Weather Models

Right Decisions from Wrong Predictions: A Mechanism Design Alternative to Individual Calibration