Abstract:The concept of "major scientific facility" was put forward by Ernest Lawrence, who invented the first cyclotron in 1929. Before Lawrence, all scientific research in the entire world can be said as "small science", which is characterized by the research carried out by individuals or in small size of groups. Since the 1930s, due to the high financial need to build larger accelerators, Lawrence realized that a major scientific research project needs to be completed by a team with people of different expertise. His concept of teamwork has become a tradition in their laboratory at Berkeley and continues to this day. Major scientific facilities can provide ultimate research methods for exploring unknowns, which may likely lead to scientific breakthroughs. Since then, a new trend has gradually emerged in the development of science and technology, that is, every major breakthrough obtained in research, and even a significant step forward, is largely inseparable from installations of large facilities. This is precisely the impetus for countries all over the world to build major scientific facilities with huge investment. The development status of large scientific facilities determines a country's ability to make such breakthroughs in cutting-edge research, and thus determines the country's scientific and technological competitiveness in the world. Through the implementation of the Manhattan Project during the Second World War, the United States was directly benefited from the fact that the remaining facilities at that time all became national laboratories after the war. Following Lawrence's original concept about the teamwork with major scientific facilities, the present article briefly reviews the history and current status of several national laboratories in the United States, and points out that the national-laboratory model can indeed form a strong scientific development impetus and play an international leading role in scientific and technological fields. I take four US national laboratories as examples: The Lawrence-Berkeley National Laboratory, the Argonne National Laboratory, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory, to show that the model, centered on large-scale facilities with the management guaranteed by effective national plans and capital investment, is worthy of in-depth study for reference. In recent years, China has strongly emphasized the importance in the development of scientific research bases and has built a number of key laboratories. It is pointed out that comparing with the standard of the world-leading laboratories, China still needs to narrow the gap in management and in operation.

Measuring national capability over big sciences multidisciplinarity: A case study of nuclear fusion research

In-depth Analysis of International Collaboration and Inter-Institutional Collaboration in Nuclear Science and Technology During 2006–2015

Recent Progress in Chinese Fusion Research Based on Superconducting Tokamak Configuration

Progress of ITER Procurement in China

Fusion Research and International Collaboration in the Asian Region

Mechanical effects: challenges for high-field superconducting magnets

Creation of Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor ITER as an Example of International Scientific and Technical Cooperation in Energy Sector

From the pocket accelerator to major scientific facilities

Dynamic Optimization Of Tokamak Plasmas Via Control Parameterization And The Time-Scaling Transformation

Feasibility Study to Byproduce Medical Radioisotopes in a Fusion Reactor

Balancing the nuclear equation: Climate policy uncertainty and budgetary dynamics

Research on a Novel Hybrid Power Supply Scheme with Energy Storage Technology for Tokamak

Highest fusion performance without harmful edge energy bursts in tokamak

Status of Development and Design of Magnetic Confinement Fusion Reactors and ITER Test Blanket Modules

Synchronized Fusion Development Considering Physics, Materials and Heat Transfer

Numerical Model of Tokamak D-D/D-T Fusion Neutron Source

Physics-informed Meta-instrument for eXperiments (PiMiX) with applications to fusion energy

Evaluation of Cfetr Key Parameters with Different Scenarios Using System Analysis Code

Effect of Fuelling Depth on the Fusion Performance and Particle Confinement of a Fusion Reactor