Making artificial $\textit{p}_{x,y}$-orbital honeycomb electron lattice on metal surface

Wen-Xuan Qiu,Liang Ma,Jing-Tao Lü,Jin-Hua Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235404

2021-08-27

Abstract:We theoretically demonstrate that the desired $p_{x,y}$-orbital honeycomb electron lattice can be readily realized by arranging CO molecules into a hexagonal lattice on Cu(111) surface with scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The electronic structure of the Cu surface states in the presence of CO molecules is calculated with various methods, \textit{i.e.}~DFT simulations, muffin-tin potential model and tight-binding model. Our calculations indicate that, by measuring the LDOS pattern using STM, the $p$-orbital surface bands can be immediately identified in experiment. We also give an analytic interpretation of the $p$-orbital LDOS pattern with $k \cdot p$ method. Meanwhile, different from the case of graphene, the $p$-orbital honeycomb lattice has two kinds of edge states, which can also be directly observed in STM experiment. Our work points out a feasible way to construct a $p_{x,y}$-orbital honeycomb electron lattice in a real system, which may have exotic properties, such as Wigner crystal, ferromagnetism, $f$-wave superconductivity, quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) effect. Furthermore, we also propose a simple way to calculate and identify the modified Cu surface bands in the Cu/CO systems with the DFT simulations. Considering the recent works about $p$-orbital square lattice in similar systems [M. R. Slot, \textit{et al.} Nat. Phys. \textbf{13}, 672 (2017); Liang Ma, \textit{et al.} Phys. Rev. B \textbf{99}, 205403 (2019)], our work once again illustrates that the artificial electron lattice on metal surface is an ideal platform to study the orbital physics in a controllable way.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: How to construct a \(p_{x,y}\) -orbital honeycomb - like electron lattice with special properties on the metal surface. Specifically, the author hopes to form a hexagonal lattice by arranging CO molecules on the Cu(111) surface and use scanning tunneling microscope (STM) technology to achieve this goal.

### Core of the Problem

1. **Theoretical Verification and Experimental Feasibility**
- Prove theoretically that the required \(p_{x,y}\) -orbital honeycomb - like electron lattice can be achieved by arranging CO molecules on the Cu(111) surface.
- Provide multiple calculation methods (such as DFT simulation, muffin - tin potential model and tight - binding model) to verify the electronic structure of this structure.

2. **Experimental Observation and Identification**
- Through STM measurement of the local density of states (LDOS) pattern, the \(p\) -orbital surface band can be directly identified in the experiment.
- Explain the analytical method of the \(p\) -orbital LDOS pattern, using the \(k\cdot p\) method.

3. **Observation of Edge States**
- Different from graphene, the \(p_{x,y}\) -orbital honeycomb - like lattice has two types of edge states, and these edge states can also be directly observed through STM experiments.

4. **Potential Physical Phenomena**
- Explore the strange properties that this artificially constructed \(p_{x,y}\) -orbital honeycomb - like electron lattice may have, such as Wigner crystal, ferromagnetism, f - wave superconductivity and quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAH effect).

### Main Contributions

- Propose a feasible scheme for constructing a \(p_{x,y}\) -orbital honeycomb - like electron lattice on the metal surface.
- Verify the feasibility of this scheme through multiple theoretical calculation methods and provide specific guidance for experimental observation.
- Point out that this artificial electron lattice is an ideal platform for studying orbital physics and has high controllability.

### Formula Summary

- **Hamiltonian**
\[
H_{\text{Cu}}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m^{*}}\nabla^{2}+U(r)
\]
where \(m^{*} = 0.38m_{0}\) is the effective mass of the copper surface state, and \(U(r)\) is the repulsive potential generated by CO molecules, with the specific form:
\[
U(r)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
U_{\text{CO}} & \text { if } r\leq d/2\\
0 & \text { otherwise }
\end{array}\right.
\]

- **Local Density of States (LDOS)**
\[
\text{LDOS}(r,\varepsilon)=\sum_{mk\sigma}|\varphi_{mk\sigma}(r)|^{2}\delta(\varepsilon-\varepsilon_{mk\sigma})
\]

- **Tight - Binding Model Hamiltonian**
\[
H(k)=t_{\parallel}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0 & H_{\parallel}\\
H_{\parallel}^{+} & 0
\end{array}\right)-t_{\perp}\left(\begin{array}{cc}
0 & H_{\perp}\\
H_{\perp}^{+} & 0
\end{array}\right)
\]
where:
\[
H_{\parallel}=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
\frac{3}{4}(e^{ikl_{1}}+e^{ikl_{2}})&\sqrt{3}/4(e^{ikl_{1}}-e^{ikl_{2}})\\
\sqrt{3}/4(e^{ikl_{1}}-e^{ikl_{2}})&\frac{1}{4}(e^{ikl_{1}}+e^{ikl_{2}})
\end{array}\right)