Abstract:Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of Da Vinci robot-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Methods: From May 2017 to July 2018, six rectal cancer patients underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted taTME at our hospital. The clinical data and short-term follow-up results were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical procedure: The patient was placed in a Trendelenburg lithotomy position and sutured with purse string 1-2 cm from the anus to the distal end of the tumor. A self-made platform for transanal surgery was installed and the robot was connected. The rectum was transected circumferentially 0.5 cm from the distal end of the purse. The robot entered the " holy plane" and separated upward between the visceral parietal fasciae to the level of the third sacrum posteriorly and the peritoneal refcection anteriorly. The abdominal trocar was repositioned and connected to the robot. Through the abdominal cavity, the Toldt space of the posterior sigmoid mesentery was entered, and the D3 lymph nodes were dissected proximally. Separation was performed distally to join the perineal approach. Specimen was pulled out from the anus and excised. The cut end of sigmoid colon was anastomosed with the distal rectum or anal canal. Operative status, postoperative pathology and short-term efficacy were analyzed. Mesorectum of specimen was evaluated as complete, near complete and incomplete according to the Nagtegaal criteria. Anastomotic leakage was evaluated according to the criteria developed by the International Rectal Cancer Research Group. Results: All the 6 patients received Da Vinci robot-assisted taTME and sigmoid-anal anastomosis. In the 6 patients, 3 were male and 3 female; mean age was (62.6±2.6) years old; body mass index was (20.5±3.0) kg/m2; distance from tumor to anal edge was (39.4±12.0) mm; length of tumor was (33.6±9.2) mm. Four patients received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. All the patients completed operations successfully without conversion to laparotomy perioperative, severe complications or death. The mean total operative time was (245.8±24.2) minutes; transition interval of two procedures was (21.2±2.6) minutes; time of transanal robotic dissection of mesorectum was (72.3±15.2) minutes; intra-operative blood loss was (86.7±59.9) ml; the height of anastomosis was (16.0±6.1) mm. There were no intra-operative complications including accidental hemorrhage or urethral injury in any patients. The length of the specimens was (177.0±33.3) mm, and the mesorectum was complete in 5 cases, and near complete in 1 case. The mean distal margin was (20.2±3.2) mm, and the proximal, distal and circumferential margins were all negative. Postoperative pathological staging: T0N0 in 1 case, T0N1 in 1 case , T2N0 in 2 cases , T4N1 in 1 case, T3N0 in 1 case. The former 5 cases received clear fluit diet on the first day, and received fluid diet on the second day after operation. The drainage tube was removed 3 to 6 days after operation. The postoperative hospital stay was 5 to 7 days. The sixth case developed grade B anastomotic leakage on the third day after operation and healed by conservative treatment. No postoperative death, and no serious complications such as intra-abdominal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction were found. All the patients were followed up for 5 to 19 months, and no local recurrence and death were observed. Conclusion: The robotic system is safe and feasible for taTME procedure in rectal cancer with good short-term efficacy. However, the long-term outcomes require further observation.

Robot‐assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma

Robotic transanal excision of rectal lesions: expert perspective and literature review

Robotic Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Potential, Challenges, and Opportunities

[Effect of Da Vinci robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal neoplasms]

Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Polyps

Robotic Rar for Rectal Cancer with Partial Pelvic Peritonectomy for Carcinosis from Pancreatic Cancer

A precise approach to robotic intracorporeal rectal transection and hand‐sewn purse‐string anastomosis for low anterior resection

Application of the Xi robotic platform for familial adenomatous polyposis with ultra-low rectal cancer: exploration of minimally invasive and refined therapies

Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS): current evidence in the treatment of early rectal neoplasia

A Single-Center Study on the Comparison of Short-Term Efficacy of Robotic and Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Middle and Low Rectal Cancer with Da Vinci (Xi)

Hybrid transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a novel approach to rectal neoplasm excision

[Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision]

Beyond total mesorectal excision: The emerging role of minimally invasive surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer

Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study

Robot-assisted resection of colorectal cancer: a comparison of preliminary results with traditional laparoscopic

Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases.

[Advances of minimally invasive technique in colorectal cancer surgery]

Robotic surgery after total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: pitfalls of beyond total mesorectal excision for patients with sidewall invasion

Surgical technique in robotic right colonic resection. How we do it: operative steps and surgical video

Robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study on surgical safety and functional outcomes