Abstract:Ambiguity aversion refers to the phenomenon that people prefer events with known probabilities to similar ambiguous events in which the decision maker does not know the values of the probabilities. Since ambiguity aversion was proposed by Ellsberg in 1961, there have been three main models accounting for ambiguity aversion: the other evaluation hypothesis, the competence hypothesis and the comparative ignorance hypothesis. The other evaluation hypothesis suggests that increasing the number of people watching a decision enhances ambiguity aversion, and enhances it more than other factors that researchers manipulate.The competence hypothesis suggests that people prefer betting on their own judgment to an equiprobable chance event only when they consider themselves knowledgeable, but not otherwise. The comparative ignorance hypothesis suggests that ambiguity aversion increases with the perception that others are more competent and more knowledgeable. To investigate the influence of joint evaluation and separate evaluation on individuals’ ambiguity aversion, a 2 (ambiguous event vs. risky event) ×2 ( joint evaluation vs. separate evaluation) mixed experimental design was adopted. In the 1first experiment, the subjects were required to indicate their WTP of ambiguous events and risky events. In the 2nd experiment, every piece of experimental episode consisted of "below" and "not below" conditions under which the subjects were required to indicate their WTP. The research revealed that there was no significant difference in WTP between ambiguous events and risky events when evaluated simultaneously, when they were separately evaluated, there was a significant difference in WTP between ambiguous events and risky events. The results indicate that, when risky events and ambiguous events are evaluated simultaneously, people opt for ambiguity aversion; in case of a separate evaluation, however, ambiguity aversion will disappear.

Decision‐making for others: Ambiguity attitudes

Event-related Potentials and the Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Self-esteem and Decision Preference in Ambiguity Decision-making

The determinants of decision time in an ambiguous context

Hey, What is Your Choice? Uncertainty and Inconsistency Enhance Subjective Anticipation of Upcoming Information in a Social Context

A Review of Ambiguity Aversion in Behavioral Decision Making

A Review and Prospect of Ambiguity Aversion in Behavioral Decision Making

Feeling Optimistic? Ambiguity Attitudes for Online Decision Making

An Ambiguity Aversion Model for Decision Making under Ambiguity

Trust As a Decision under Ambiguity

Quantitative vs. Qualitative Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study of Risk and Ambiguity in Monetary and Medical Decision-Making

The Endowment Effect and Decision Preference in Ambiguity Decision Making

Randomization advice and ambiguity aversion

Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity

Are ambiguity preferences aligned with risk preferences?

Climate policy: How to deal with ambiguity?

The Formation Mechanism of Ambiguity Aversion:A Perspective Based on the Evaluability Hypothesis

Social and Strategic Ambiguity Versus Betrayal Aversion.

Ambiguity Attitudes over Time