Abstract:Patient safety is a cornerstone of high quality cancer care. However, current efforts rely on clinician-centric methods. In this IRB-approved pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of an innovative approach to prospectively capture system safety data using patient-reported non-routine events (PNREs), defined as events that deviate from expected/optimal care. We postulated that safety-related PNREs will identify potential flaws in cancer care pathways that increase the likelihood of unplanned treatment events/errors (UTEs) and lower standardized experience measures. Eligibility included ECOG 0-2 adult patients with newly diagnosed head/neck & lung cancer scheduled to receive curative radiation (RT). PNREs, using our previously validated Patient-reported Comprehensive Open-ended Non-routine Event Survey (PCONES) tool, and patient-reported experience measures including: the EORTC-QLQ-30 (to compute a Global Health Status (GHS) on a 0-100 scale), the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT, 0-10 scale), and 4 core ambulatory Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey questions, were collected at each on-treatment visit. Additionally, physicians completed the NCI CTCAE v4.0 toxicity score and collected UTEs from the patients' medical records. Propensity score weighting and regression methods were used to quantify associations between PNREs and patient experience. 20/24 patients (pts) who enrolled with 2 months f/u during RT comprise our study cohort. Mean age was 64.5±2.1 year (SEM); 60% male. Overall, 80 encounters occurred, median of 4 (range: 3-5). In 39% of encounters, at least one PNRE was reported yielding 40 total PNREs from 75% of the pts. 32.5% of PNREs were safety related while the remaining were related to pts' care experience. In encounters when pts did not report PNREs, the GHS and DT measurements were 70.8±3.0 and 2.5±0.4, respectively. In cases where pts reported at least one PNRE, GHS decreased to 63.9±4.4 (p=0.182) and distress increased to 3.7±0.6 (p=0.088). The GHS was even lower (56.4±6.9) and distress higher (4.6±0.9) in pts who experienced safety-related PNREs. Three study pts each had one UTE (15% of participants), including a hospital readmission for surgical complications. 15.4% of the adult safety-related PNREs related to these UTEs. The 5 pts who never reported a PNRE experienced no UTEs. Encounters in which PNREs were reported were associated with lower CAHPS composite scores – no PNRE: 58% top-box ratings; ≥1 PNRE: 19% top-box ratings (p<0.001). This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of collecting PNREs to identify potential systems safety risks in a radiation oncology clinic. Future efforts will include a large phase II trial to validate these findings, and to assess the value of PNREs in improving cancer care processes and patients' outcomes.

Relationship between reasons for intermittent missing patient-reported outcomes data and missing data mechanisms

Missingness mechanisms and generalizability of patient reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer survivors – assessing the reasonableness of the "missing completely at random" assumption

The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature

Enhancing representativeness of patient-reported outcomes in routine radiation oncology care: a quality improvement protocol to address non-response

Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study

Meta‐Analysis of Studies with Missing Data

Reporting Missing Participant Data in Randomised Trials: Systematic Survey of the Methodological Literature and a Proposed Guide.

Abstract 86: Understanding Patterns Of Missingness In Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Secondary Analysis Of Pooled Patient-level Follow-up Data.

Missing data were poorly reported and handled in randomized controlled trials with repeatedly measured continuous outcomes: a cross-sectional survey

Evaluating the Use of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure in Cancer Care: A Pilot Study in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy

Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature

Improving completion rates of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer clinical trials: Scoping review investigating the implications for trial designs

Relevance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with Cancer: Detection of Underrated Psychological Distress of Palliative Care Patients in an Outpatient Setting

Evaluation of nurse‐reported missed care in a post‐anesthesia care unit: A mixed‐methods study

Nonresponse Bias Analysis in Longitudinal Studies: A Comparative Review with an Application to the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

Handling Trial Participants with Missing Outcome Data when Conducting a Meta-Analysis: a Systematic Survey of Proposed Approaches.

Perceptions of Response Burden Associated with Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Assessments in Oncology.

Missingness in the expanded prostate cancer index short form (EPIC-26) - prevalence, patterns, and explanatory factors

Response processes for patients providing quantitative self-report data: a qualitative study

Abstract TP97: Feasibility and Reliability of Patient-Reported Scores to Assess Long-Term Functional Outcomes in Stroke: A Sub-Group Analysis of the MaRISS Trial