Sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor requires E-cadherin expression in urothelial carcinoma cells

Peter C Black,Gordon A Brown,Teruo Inamoto,Marissa Shrader,Ameeta Arora,Arlene O Siefker-Radtke,Liana Adam,Dan Theodorescu,Xifeng Wu,Mark F Munsell,Menashe Bar-Eli,David J McConkey,Colin P N Dinney
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1593
2008-03-01
Abstract:Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an attractive target for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma, but a clinical response can be expected in only a small proportion of patients. The aim of this study was to define molecular markers of response to cetuximab therapy in a panel of urothelial carcinoma cell lines. Experimental design: Eleven cell lines were investigated for antiproliferative response to cetuximab based on [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. A variety of markers, including EGFR expression, phosphorylation, and gene amplification, as well as the expression of other growth factor receptors, their ligands, and markers of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition were investigated. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to estimate the agreement between response and expression of these markers. E-cadherin was silenced by small interfering RNA in two sensitive cell lines, and the effect on the response to cetuximab was measured. Results: We were able to identify a panel of relevant markers pertaining especially to alternate growth factor receptor expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that predicted response to cetuximab. The data suggested that expression of intact HER-4 (kappa, 1.00; P = 0.008), E-cadherin (kappa, 0.81; P = 0.015), and beta-catenin (kappa, 0.81; P = 0.015) and loss of expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (kappa, 0.57; P = 0.167) were associated with response to cetuximab therapy. Silencing E-cadherin in two sensitive cell lines reduced responsiveness to cetuximab in both (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A panel of predictive markers for cetuximab response has been established in vitro and is currently being evaluated in a prospective clinical trial of neoadjuvant EGFR-targeted therapy. Most importantly, E-cadherin seems to play a central role in modulation of EGFR response in urothelial carcinoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?