Abstract:Abstract Background In response to a growing movement to involve patients and community stakeholders in health research, we established a parent advisory group in 2016. The group meets regularly to act as advisors and partners for our research program. The purpose of this paper is to describe our experiences establishing the group, and results from parent evaluations. Methods We contacted 191 organizations to recruit parents and caregivers of children who wanted to contribute to child health research. Our initial goal was to recruit 8 to 10 parents who would meet regularly (approximately 8 times per year). We conducted an online baseline survey of members after the first two meetings to understand motivations for participating and early experiences. Sixteen months later we conducted another online survey to identify what was going well and areas for improvement. Results Twelve parents initially joined the group. The baseline survey ( n = 9 complete) identified motivations for participation: wanting a patient/family voice in health research; personal experience accessing health system for child’s care; wanting to improve healthcare communications. Concerns about participation included: having sufficient time to attend meetings; whether contributions would be worthwhile; and uncertainty about how the group’s input would be used in practice. Parents identified aspects that were working well: opportunity to provide constructive feedback; diversity among parents involved; well-run and organized meetings (agenda and materials sent prior to meeting, skilled facilitation, adequate time for discussion). Items parents identified as not working well were: fluctuating attendance; not knowing others in the group; challenges if attending remotely. At follow-up, there were seven active members. The follow-up survey ( n = 5 complete) identified positive feedback related to group dynamics (e.g., collegial, everyone participates) and organization of meetings. Suggestions for improvement included increasing membership, regular attendance, and providing adequate information/context to allow meaningful input. Conclusions Our experience establishing a parent advisory group and evaluation of the group by parent members have yielded tremendous insights around involving parents and patient proxies in health research. The parent advisory group is a dynamic entity requiring ongoing communication between researchers and members. Effective means of evaluating engagement is essential to ensure it is meaningful. Dedicated time, funding and resources are required for success.

Neuronal Expression of the Human Neuropeptide S Receptor NPSR1 Identifies NPS-Induced Calcium Signaling Pathways

Improving the use of data for HIV prevention decision making: lessons learned

Bridging data and decision making: development of techniques for improving the HIV prevention community planning process

Congregation leader and member discussions in a church-based family strengthening, mental health promotion and HIV prevention trial: Intervention

Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health

A social innovation to empower community-led monitoring and mobilization for HIV prevention in rural Kenya: experimenting to reduce the HIV prevention policy-implementation gap

Community Insights in Phylogenetic HIV Research: The CIPHR Project Protocol

A Community-Based Participatory Approach to the Development and Implementation of an HIV Health Behavior Intervention: Lessons Learned in Navigating Research and Practice Systems from Project HAPPY

Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention

Longitudinal analysis of minority women’s perceptions of cohesion: the role of cooperation, communication, and competition

Community Grand Rounds: Re-Engineering Community and Academic Partnerships in Health Education—A Partnership and Programmatic Evaluation

Social Network Characteristics Associated with More Frequent HIV and STI Prevention Conversations: The N2 Cohort Study in Chicago

Longitudinal Effects of SafeTalk, a Motivational Interviewing-Based Program to Improve Safer Sex Practices Among People Living with HIV/AIDS

Errors in the diagnosis of tetanus.

Perceptions of Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing Factors Influencing the Use of a Continuity of Care Document in Special Needs PLWH

The Tulumbe! Partnership: a case study in developing a community-led research agenda to address HIV among African immigrants in the United States

Longitudinal predictors of post-exposure prophylaxis awareness among latino sexual minority men in South Florida

Transgenic mice--a gold mine for furthering knowledge in pathobiology.

Snakes and ladders: A qualitative study understanding the active ingredients of social interaction around the use of audit and feedback

Promoting health equity in HIV prevention and treatment research: a practical guide to establishing, implementing, and sustaining community advisory boards

Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model