Abstract:Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making. Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making.

GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINT SOLVING IN ℜ2 AND ℜ3

Neutrophils Promote Hematopoiesis Via a Novel Mechanism Involving Leucine Rich α-2 Glycoprotein (LRG)

G Protein-Coupled Receptor 183 Plays a Prognostic Factor in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Regulating Immune Regulation

LRRC25 Plays a Key Role in All-Trans Retinoic Acid-Induced Granulocytic Differentiation As a Novel Potential Leukocyte Differentiation Antigen

Regulator of G protein signaling 5 restricts neutrophil chemotaxis and trafficking

Cytokine-Regulated GADD45G Induces Differentiation and Lineage Selection in Hematopoietic Stem Cells

G-CSF Receptor Activation of the Src Kinase Lyn is Mediated by Gab2 Recruitment of the Shp2 Phosphatase.

Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Controlled by the Pu.1-Gata1 Switch

PU.1 Dose-Dependently Induces Granulocyte or Macrophage Commitment by Targeting Lineage Restricted Genes and by Regulating Transcription Factors Egr2, Nab2, Cebpa and Gfi1.

Genetic and epigenetic orchestration of Gfi1aa-Lsd1- cebpα in zebrafish neutrophil development

Helicopter classification with a high PRF radar

Adrenal steroid modulation of vasoactive intestinal peptide effect on serotonin1 binding sites in the rat brain shown by in vitro quantitative autoradiography.

Gene Expression during the Generation and Activation of Mouse Neutrophils: Implication of Novel Functional and Regulatory Pathways

GRK6 deficiency is associated with enhanced CXCR4-mediated neutrophil chemotaxis in vitro and impaired responsiveness to G-CSF in vivo

Radical Alkynyltrifluoromethylation of Alkenes Initiated by an Electron Donor-Acceptor Complex.

GM-CSF receptor expression determines opposing innate memory phenotypes at different stages of myelopoiesis

High interleukin-3 concentrations prime murine myeloid progenitor cells towards granulocytic differentiation

A pseudo lossless image compression method

Expression and secretion of galectin‐12 in the context of neutrophilic differentiation of human promyeloblastic HL‐60 cells

Potential of Pteris vittata to Remove Tetracycline Antibiotics from Aquatic Media

High expression of lactotriaosylceramide, a differentiation-associated glycosphingolipid, in the bone marrow of acute myeloid leukemia patients.