Abstract:There have been impressive advancements in the field of natural language processing (NLP) in recent years, largely driven by innovations in the development of transformer-based large language models (LLM) that utilize "attention." This approach employs masked self-attention to establish (via similarly) different positions of tokens (words) within an inputted sequence of tokens to compute the most appropriate response based on its training corpus. However, there is speculation as to whether this approach alone can be scaled up to develop emergent artificial general intelligence (AGI), and whether it can address the alignment of AGI values with human values (called the alignment problem). Some researchers exploring the alignment problem highlight three aspects that AGI (or AI) requires to help resolve this problem: (1) an interpretable values specification; (2) a utility function; and (3) a dynamic contextual account of behavior. Here, a neurosymbolic model is proposed to help resolve these issues of human value alignment in AI, which expands on the transformer-based model for NLP to incorporate symbolic reasoning that may allow AGI to incorporate perspective-taking reasoning (i.e., resolving the need for a dynamic contextual account of behavior through deictics) as defined by a multilevel evolutionary and neurobiological framework into a functional contextual post-Skinnerian model of human language called "Neurobiological and Natural Selection Relational Frame Theory" (N-Frame). It is argued that this approach may also help establish a comprehensible value scheme, a utility function by expanding the expected utility equation of behavioral economics to consider functional contextualism, and even an observer (or witness) centric model for consciousness. Evolution theory, subjective quantum mechanics, and neuroscience are further aimed to help explain consciousness, and possible implementation within an LLM through correspondence to an interface as suggested by N-Frame. This argument is supported by the computational level of hypergraphs, relational density clusters, a conscious quantum level defined by QBism, and real-world applied level (human user feedback). It is argued that this approach could enable AI to achieve consciousness and develop deictic perspective-taking abilities, thereby attaining human-level self-awareness, empathy, and compassion toward others. Importantly, this consciousness hypothesis can be directly tested with a significance of approximately 5-sigma significance (with a 1 in 3.5 million probability that any identified AI-conscious observations in the form of a collapsed wave form are due to chance factors) through double-slit intent-type experimentation and visualization procedures for derived perspective-taking relational frames. Ultimately, this could provide a solution to the alignment problem and contribute to the emergence of a theory of mind (ToM) within AI.

Integrative Biological Simulation, Neuropsychology, and AI Safety

NeuroAI for AI Safety

Bio-inspired AI: Integrating Biological Complexity into Artificial Intelligence

Toward AI-Driven Digital Organism: Multiscale Foundation Models for Predicting, Simulating and Programming Biology at All Levels

Catalyzing next-generation Artificial Intelligence through NeuroAI

Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence

Integrative biological simulation praxis: Considerations from physics, philosophy, and data/model curation practices

Biological Blueprints for Next Generation AI Systems

Towards a Healthy AI Tradition: Lessons from Biology and Biomedical Science

The Introspective Agent: Interdependence of Strategy, Physiology, and Sensing for Embodied Agents

Starting a Synthetic Biological Intelligence Lab from Scratch

A functional contextual, observer-centric, quantum mechanical, and neuro-symbolic approach to solving the alignment problem of artificial general intelligence: safe AI through intersecting computational psychological neuroscience and LLM architecture for emergent theory of mind

Biological and artificial cognition: what can we learn about mechanisms by modelling physical cognition problems using artificial intelligence planning techniques?

Prioritizing High-Consequence Biological Capabilities in Evaluations of Artificial Intelligence Models

From homeostasis to resource sharing: Biologically and economically compatible multi-objective multi-agent AI safety benchmarks

Human-AI Safety: A Descendant of Generative AI and Control Systems Safety

Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence

Adaptive Intelligence: leveraging insights from adaptive behavior in animals to build flexible AI systems

A perspective on large-scale simulation as an enabler for novel biorobotics applications

A brain basis of dynamical intelligence for AI and computational neuroscience

Meta-learning, social cognition and consciousness in brains and machines