Abstract:Parameters in climate models are usually calibrated manually, exploiting only small subsets of the available data. This precludes both optimal calibration and quantification of uncertainties. Traditional Bayesian calibration methods that allow uncertainty quantification are too expensive for climate models; they are also not robust in the presence of internal climate variability. For example, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically require model runs and are sensitive to internal variability noise, rendering them infeasible for climate models. Here we demonstrate an approach to model calibration and uncertainty quantification that requires only model runs and can accommodate internal climate variability. The approach consists of three stages: (a) a calibration stage uses variants of ensemble Kalman inversion to calibrate a model by minimizing mismatches between model and data statistics; (b) an emulation stage emulates the parameter‐to‐data map with Gaussian processes (GP), using the model runs in the calibration stage for training; (c) a sampling stage approximates the Bayesian posterior distributions by sampling the GP emulator with MCMC. We demonstrate the feasibility and computational efficiency of this calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES) approach in a perfect‐model setting. Using an idealized general circulation model, we estimate parameters in a simple convection scheme from synthetic data generated with the model. The CES approach generates probability distributions of the parameters that are good approximations of the Bayesian posteriors, at a fraction of the computational cost usually required to obtain them. Sampling from this approximate posterior allows the generation of climate predictions with quantified parametric uncertainties. Calibrating climate models with available data and quantifying their uncertainties are essential to make climate predictions accurate and actionable. A primary source of uncertainties in climate models comes from representation of small‐scale processes such as moist convection. Parameters in convection schemes and other parameterizations are usually calibrated by hand, using only a small fraction of data that are available. As a result, the calibration process may miss information about the small‐scale processes in question. This paper presents a proof‐of‐concept, in an idealized setting, of how parameters in climate models can be calibrated using a substantial fraction of the available data, and how uncertainties in the parameters can be quantified. We employ a new algorithm, called calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES), which makes such calibration and uncertainty quantification feasible for computationally expensive climate models. CES reduces the hundreds of thousands of model runs usually required to quantify uncertainties in computer models to hundreds, thereby achieving about a factor 1,000 speedup. It leads to more robust calibration and uncertainty quantification in the presence of noise arising from chaotic variability of the climate system. We show how uncertainties in climate model parameters can be translated into quantified uncertainties of climate predictions through ensemble integrations. We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution

Calibration of imperfect geophysical models by multiple satellite interferograms with measurement bias

Observability-Aware Intrinsic and Extrinsic Calibration of LiDAR-IMU Systems

Model calibration via distributionally robust optimization: On the NASA Langley Uncertainty Quantification Challenge

Calibration of a Distributed Flood Forecasting Model with Input Uncertainty Using a Bayesian Framework

Verified Uncertainty Calibration

Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy

A composite likelihood approach to computer model calibration using high-dimensional spatial data

Improving glacio-hydrological model calibration and model performance in cold regions using satellite snow cover data

Consideration of Radiometric Quantization Error in Satellite Sensor Cross-Calibration

Calib3D: Calibrating Model Preferences for Reliable 3D Scene Understanding

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks for Geophysical Applications

A collaborative model calibration framework under uncertainty considering parameter distribution

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM

Robust Algorithms for History Matching of Imperfect Subsurface Models

Regionally adjusted stochastic earthquake ground motion models, associated variabilities and epistemic uncertainties

The Uncertainty of SNO Cross-Calibration for Satellite Infrared Channels

Calibration of airborne interferometric SAR data by external dem without artificial calibrators

Probabilistic Calibration of a Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Slope Stability Model with Integration of Multiple Observations

Integrating Bayesian Calibration, Bias Correction, and Machine Learning for the 2014 Sandia Verification and Validation Challenge Problem

Bayesian Model Calibration for Extrapolative Prediction via Gibbs Posteriors

Bayesian Projected Calibration of Computer Models