Abstract:The current investigation focuses on detailed analysis of the anchor-based optimization approach (ABOA), its comparison with alternative global fitting protocols and on the global analysis of the truncation of basis effects in the calculation of binding energies. It is shown that ABOA provides a solution which is close to that obtained in alternative approaches but at small portion of their computational time. The application of a softer correction function after few initial iterations of ABOA stabilizes and speeds up its convergence. The numerical errors in the calculation of binding energies related to the truncation of bosonic and fermionic bases have been globally investigated with respect of asymptotic values corresponding to the infinite basis in the framework of covariant density functional theory (CDFT). These errors typically grow with the increase of the mass and deformation of the nuclei. To reduce such errors in bosonic sector below 10 keV for almost all nuclei with proton number Z<120 one should truncate the bosonic basis at NB=28 instead of presently used NB=20 . The reduction of the errors in binding energies due to the truncation of the fermionic basis in CDFT is significantly more numerically costly. For the first time it is shown that the pattern and the speed of the convergence of binding energies as a function of the size of fermionic basis given by NF depend on the type of covariant energy density functional. The use of explicit density dependence of the meson-nucleon coupling constants or point couplings slows substantially the speed of convergence of binding energies as a function of NF . The present paper clearly indicates the need for accounting of infinite basis corrections for accurate calculation of binding energies and for fitting more precise next-generation covariant energy density functionals: note that such corrections are neglected in the present generation of the functionals. A procedure for finding the asymptotic values of binding energies is suggested in the present paper: it allows better control of numerical errors. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024321 ©2024 American Physical Society

Nuclear kinetic density from ab initio theory

Nuclear energy density functionals from empirical ground-state densities

A new Green's function formalism for kinetic energy density functional for atomic and molecular system: Emergence of $N-$dependence using model potentials

Multicomponent Density-Functional Theory for Electrons and Nuclei

Nuclear level density from relativistic density functional theory and combinatorial method

Orbital-free Density Functional Theory: differences and similarities between electronic and nuclear systems

Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional for nuclear structure

Optimized nuclear energy density functionals including long-range pion contributions

Quantum Density Mechanics: Accurate, purely density-based \textit{ab initio} implementation of many-electron quantum mechanics

KineticNet: Deep learning a transferable kinetic energy functional for orbital-free density functional theory

Generalised description of Neutron Star matter with nucleonic Relativistic Density Functional

Nuclear incompressibility and speed of sound in uniform matter and finite nuclei

Nuclear charge densities in spherical and deformed nuclei: towards precise calculations of charge radii

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional theory for nuclear structure

A Data-Driven Density Functional Model for Nuclear Systems

Ab Initio Nuclear Many-Body Perturbation Calculations in the Hartree-Fock Basis

Kinetic energy density study of some representative semilocal kinetic energy functionals

Towards accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

Open problems in nuclear density functional theory