Abstract:The current investigation focuses on detailed analysis of the anchor-based optimization approach (ABOA), its comparison with alternative global fitting protocols and on the global analysis of the truncation of basis effects in the calculation of binding energies. It is shown that ABOA provides a solution which is close to that obtained in alternative approaches but at small portion of their computational time. The application of a softer correction function after few initial iterations of ABOA stabilizes and speeds up its convergence. The numerical errors in the calculation of binding energies related to the truncation of bosonic and fermionic bases have been globally investigated with respect of asymptotic values corresponding to the infinite basis in the framework of covariant density functional theory (CDFT). These errors typically grow with the increase of the mass and deformation of the nuclei. To reduce such errors in bosonic sector below 10 keV for almost all nuclei with proton number Z<120 one should truncate the bosonic basis at NB=28 instead of presently used NB=20 . The reduction of the errors in binding energies due to the truncation of the fermionic basis in CDFT is significantly more numerically costly. For the first time it is shown that the pattern and the speed of the convergence of binding energies as a function of the size of fermionic basis given by NF depend on the type of covariant energy density functional. The use of explicit density dependence of the meson-nucleon coupling constants or point couplings slows substantially the speed of convergence of binding energies as a function of NF . The present paper clearly indicates the need for accounting of infinite basis corrections for accurate calculation of binding energies and for fitting more precise next-generation covariant energy density functionals: note that such corrections are neglected in the present generation of the functionals. A procedure for finding the asymptotic values of binding energies is suggested in the present paper: it allows better control of numerical errors. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024321 ©2024 American Physical Society

Nuclear energy density functionals from empirical ground-state densities

A Data-Driven Density Functional Model for Nuclear Systems

Optimized nuclear energy density functionals including long-range pion contributions

Nuclear Energy Density Functionals from Machine Learning

Accurate relativistic density functional for exchange energy of atomic nuclei

Relativistic energy density functional from momentum space to coordinate space within a coherent density fluctuation model

Optimizing the relativistic energy density functional with nuclear ground state and collective excitation properties

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional for nuclear structure

Relativistic density functional theory in nuclear physics

A new Green's function formalism for kinetic energy density functional for atomic and molecular system: Emergence of $N-$dependence using model potentials

Elucidate the nonrelativistic and relativistic energy density functional from momentum space to coordinate space within local density approximation

Nuclear level density from relativistic density functional theory and combinatorial method

Energy-density functionals inspired by effective-field theories: Applications to neutron drops

Towards an ab initio covariant density functional theory for nuclear structure

Towards the Universal Nuclear Energy Density Functional

Toward accurate nuclear mass tables in covariant density functional theory

Toward a Bridge Between Relativistic and Nonrelativistic Density Functional Theories for Nuclei

Multicomponent Density-Functional Theory for Electrons and Nuclei

Energy Density Functionals From the Strong-Coupling Limit Applied to the Anions of the He Isoelectronic Series

Open problems in nuclear density functional theory