Pink Work: Same-Sex Marriage, Employment and Discrimination

Dario Sansone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.06698

2018-07-18

Abstract:This paper analyzes how the legalization of same-sex marriage in the U.S. affected gay and lesbian couples in the labor market. Results from a difference-in-difference model show that both partners in same-sex couples were more likely to be employed, to have a full-time contract, and to work longer hours in states that legalized same-sex marriage. In line with a theoretical search model of discrimination, suggestive empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that marriage equality led to an improvement in employment outcomes among gays and lesbians and lower occupational segregation thanks to a decrease in discrimination towards sexual minorities.

Econometrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to analyze the impact of the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States on same-sex couples in the labor market. Specifically, the author constructs a difference-in-differences model to explore the following questions:

1. **Employment Rate**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage increase the employment rate of same-sex couples?
2. **Full-time Work**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage increase the likelihood of same-sex couples engaging in full-time work?
3. **Working Hours**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage increase the working hours of same-sex couples?
4. **Wage Income**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage increase the wage income of same-sex couples?
5. **Occupational Choice**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage change the occupational choices of same-sex couples?
6. **Self-employment**: Does the legalization of same-sex marriage affect the self-employment status of same-sex couples?

### Research Background

Despite significant progress in gay rights over the past 20 years, research on the specific impacts of these reforms on same-sex couples remains relatively scarce. Additionally, although anti-gay sentiments may still exist, they might be underestimated. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how the legalization of same-sex marriage affects the welfare and social norms of gay individuals.

### Main Findings

1. **Employment Rate**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, the employment rate of same-sex couples significantly increased. Specifically, the probability of both partners in a same-sex couple being employed increased by about 2.3 percentage points.
2. **Full-time Work**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, the probability of both partners in a same-sex couple engaging in full-time work also increased.
3. **Working Hours**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, the weekly working hours of same-sex couples increased by about 1.3 hours.
4. **Wage Income**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, the wage income of male same-sex couples significantly increased, but there was no significant change in the wage income of female same-sex couples.
5. **Occupational Choice**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, occupational segregation decreased, indicating more diverse occupational choices among gay individuals.
6. **Self-employment**: After the legalization of same-sex marriage, the self-employment rate of same-sex couples also increased.

### Potential Mechanisms

The author supports the following hypothesis through theoretical models and empirical evidence: the legalization of same-sex marriage reduces discrimination based on sexual orientation, thereby improving the performance of gay individuals in the labor market. Additionally, the study rules out some alternative explanations, such as changes in fertility rates, matching effects, and changes in homeownership rates.

### Conclusion

Through detailed empirical analysis, this paper demonstrates the positive impact of the legalization of same-sex marriage on same-sex couples in the labor market. These findings not only provide important references for policymakers but also offer economic justification for further promoting gay rights.