Abstract:Abstract We choose the Reduction Formula, PCAC and Low Energy Theory to reduce the S matrix of a OZI allowed two-body strong decay involving a light pseudoscalar, the covariant transition amplitude formula with relativistic wave functions as input is derived. After confirm this method by the decay $$D^*(2010)\rightarrow D\pi $$ D ∗ ( 2010 ) → D π , we study the newly observed $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + with supposing it to be the state $$D_s(2^1S_0)^+$$ D s ( 2 1 S 0 ) + , we find its decay width $$\Gamma $$ Γ is highly sensitive to the $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + mass, which result in the meaningless comparison of widths by different models with various input masses. Instead of width, we studied the overlap integral over the wave functions of initial and final states, here we parameterized it as X which is model-independent, and the ratio $$\Gamma /{|{\mathbf {P}_f}|^3}$$ Γ / | P f | 3 , both are almost mass independent, to give us useful information. The results show that, all the existing theoretical predictions $$X_{D_s(2S) \rightarrow D^*K}=0.25\sim 0.41$$ X D s ( 2 S ) → D ∗ K = 0.25 ∼ 0.41 and $$\Gamma /{|{\mathbf {P}_f}|^3}=0.81\sim 1.77$$ Γ / | P f | 3 = 0.81 ∼ 1.77 $$\hbox {MeV}^{-2}$$ MeV - 2 are smaller than experimental data $$0.585^{+0.015}_{-0.035}$$ 0 . 585 - 0.035 + 0.015 and $$4.54^{+0.25}_{-0.52}$$ 4 . 54 - 0.52 + 0.25 $$\hbox {MeV}^{-2}$$ MeV - 2 . Further compared with $$X^{ex}_{D^*(2010) \rightarrow D\pi }=0.540\pm 0.009$$ X D ∗ ( 2010 ) → D π ex = 0.540 ± 0.009 , the current data $$X^{ex}_{D_s(2S) \rightarrow D^*K}=0.585^{+0.015}_{-0.035}$$ X D s ( 2 S ) → D ∗ K ex = 0 . 585 - 0.035 + 0.015 is too big to be an reasonable value, so it is early to say $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$ D s 0 ( 2590 ) + is the conventional $$D_s(2^1S_0)^+$$ D s ( 2 1 S 0 ) + meson.

Hadronic molecular assignment for the newly observed $Ω^*$ state

Reanalysis of the newly observed Ω * state in a hadronic molecule model

The $Ω(2012)$ as a hadronic molecule

On the molecular nature of the $Ω_c(3120)$ and its analogy with the $Ω(2012)$

Toward discovering the excited $Ω$ baryons through nonleptonic weak decays of $Ω_c$

Testing the molecular nature of the $Ω(2012)$ with the $ψ(3770) \to \barΩ \bar{K} Ξ$ and $ψ(3770) \to \barΩ \bar{K} Ξ^*(1530) (\bar Ω\bar K πΞ)$ reactions

Theoretical study of the Ω ( 2012 ) state in the Ω c 0 → π + Ω ( 2012 ) − → π + ( K ̄ Ξ ) − and π + ( K ̄ Ξ π ) − decays

Interpretation of the newly discovered $Ω$(2012)

Observation of $Ω(2012)^- \to Ξ(1530)\bar{K}$ and measurement of the effective couplings of $Ω(2012)^-$ to $Ξ(1530)\bar{K}$ and $Ξ\bar{K}$

The newly observed $Ω_c(3327)$: A good candidate for a $D$-wave charmed baryon

Investigating excited $Ω_c$ states from pentaquark perspective

Internal structures of the baryons $Ξ(2030)$ and $Ξ(2120)$

The $Ω_c \to π^+ \, (π^0,\, η)\, πΞ^*$ reactions and the two $Ξ(1820)$ states

Excited $Ω$ hyperon in charmful $Ω_b$ weak decays

Excited $Ω_c$ baryons as 2S states

Interpretation of the Newly Observed Ω_c^0 Resonances

Investigation of the mass spectra of singly heavy baryons $Σ_{Q}$, $Ξ^{\prime}_{Q}$ and $Ω_{Q}$ $(Q=c, b)$ in the Regge trajectory model

Molecular $Ω_b$ states

The newly observed state $$D_{s0}(2590)^{+}$$

Hadronic weak decays of the charmed baryon $Ω_c$

The singly-charmed pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules