Abstract:In this work, a combined analysis is performed on the processes of \begin{document}$e^+e^-\to\omega\pi^0\pi^0$\end{document}, \begin{document}$e^+e^-\to\omega\pi^+\pi^-$\end{document}, and \begin{document}$e^+e^-\to\omega\eta$\end{document} to study possible \begin{document}$\omega$\end{document} excited states at approximately 2.2 GeV. The resonance parameters are extracted by simultaneous fits of the Born cross section line shapes of these processes. In the fit with one resonance, the mass and width are fitted to be \begin{document}$(2207\pm14)$\end{document} MeV\begin{document}$/c^2$\end{document} and \begin{document}$(104\pm16)$\end{document} MeV, respectively. The result is consistent with previous measurements. In the fit with two resonances, the mass and width for the first resonance are fitted to be \begin{document}$(2160\pm36)$\end{document} MeV\begin{document}$/c^2$\end{document} (solution I), \begin{document}$(2154\pm12)$\end{document} MeV\begin{document}$/c^2$\end{document} (solution II) and \begin{document}$(141\pm74)$\end{document} MeV (solution I), \begin{document}$(152\pm77)$\end{document} MeV (solution II), respectively. The mass and width for the second resonance are fitted to be \begin{document}$(2298\pm19)$\end{document} MeV\begin{document}$/c^2$\end{document} (solution I), \begin{document}$(2309\pm6)$\end{document} MeV\begin{document}$/c^2$\end{document} (solution II) and \begin{document}$(106\pm77)$\end{document} MeV (solution I), \begin{document}$(99\pm23)$\end{document} MeV (solution II), respectively. The result is consistent with the theoretical prediction of \begin{document}$\omega(4S)$\end{document} and \begin{document}$\omega(3D)$\end{document}. The intermediate subprocesses in \begin{document}$e^+e^-\to\omega\pi^+\pi^-$\end{document} are analyzed using the resonance parameters of the previous fits in this work. In the fit with one resonance, the fitting result of \begin{document}$\varGamma^{e^+e^-}_{{\rm{R}}}B_{{\rm{R}}}$\end{document} is partially consistent with the previous result. In the fit with two resonances, the fitting result of \begin{document}$\varGamma^{e^+e^-}_{{\rm{R}}}B_{{\rm{R}}}$\end{document} is of the same order of magnitude as the theoretical prediction. This work may provide useful information for studying the light flavor vector meson family.

The $Ω_c \to π^+ \, (π^0,\, η)\, πΞ^*$ reactions and the two $Ξ(1820)$ states

Theoretical interpretation of the $Ξ(1620)$ and $Ξ(1690)$ resonances seen in $Ξ_c^+ \to Ξ^- π^+ π^+$ decay

Testing the molecular nature of the $Ω(2012)$ with the $ψ(3770) \to \barΩ \bar{K} Ξ$ and $ψ(3770) \to \barΩ \bar{K} Ξ^*(1530) (\bar Ω\bar K πΞ)$ reactions

A Coherent Study of <i>e</i><sup>+</sup><i>e</i><sup>−</sup>→<i>ω</i>π<sup>0</sup>, <i>ω</i>π<sup>+</sup>π<sup>−</sup>, and &Lt;i>ωη</i>

Theoretical study of the Ω ( 2012 ) state in the Ω c 0 → π + Ω ( 2012 ) − → π + ( K ̄ Ξ ) − and π + ( K ̄ Ξ π ) − decays

Searching for the two poles of the $Ξ(1820)$ in the $ψ(3686) \to \barΞ^+ \bar{K}^0 Σ^{*-}(π^- Λ)$ decay

Toward discovering the excited $Ω$ baryons through nonleptonic weak decays of $Ω_c$

Investigating $Ξ$ resonances from pentaquark perspective

Theoretical study on $Λ_c^+ \to ΛK^+\bar{K}^0$ decay and $Ξ^*(1690)$ resonance

The $Λ_c^+\toηπ^+Λ$ reaction and the $Λa_0^+(980)$ and $π^+Λ(1670)$ contributions

The scalar $$f_0(500)$$, $$f_0(980)$$, and $$a_0(980)$$ resonances and vector mesons in the single Cabibbo-suppressed decays $$\Lambda _c \rightarrow p K^+K^-$$ and $$p\pi ^+\pi ^-$$

The $Ω(2012)$ as a hadronic molecule

On the molecular nature of the $Ω_c(3120)$ and its analogy with the $Ω(2012)$

One or two poles for the $Ξ(1820)$?

Roles of the scalar $f_0(500)$ and $f_0(980)$ in the process $D^0\to π^0π^0 \bar{K}^0$

Excited $Ω_c$ baryons as 2S states

Interpretation of the Newly Observed Ω_c^0 Resonances

Double strangeness pentaquarks and other exotic hadrons in the $Ξ_b \to Ξ J/Ψ ϕ$ decay

The Form Factors of Ωπ0 and Π+π− at Ψ(2s)

Investigating excited $Ω_c$ states from pentaquark perspective

Resonances in $D^0\toπ^+π^-\ell^+\ell^-$ and sensitivity to New Physics