Abstract:The true marine parasequences parameter matrix (left) and the summary statistics for the posterior estimates from the MDN (top) and McMC (bottom). The statistics are the posterior mean, posterior standard deviation, and the travel time misfits. Geological process models typically simulate a range of dynamic processes to evolve a base topography into a final two‐dimensional cross section or three‐dimensional geological scenario. In principle, process parameters may be updated to better align with observed geophysical or geological data. However, it is hard to find any process model realisations that fit all observations if data sets are complex and sparse in space or time because the simulations typically depend highly non‐linearly on base topography and dynamic parameters. As an alternative, geophysical probabilistic tomographic methods may be used to estimate the family of models of a target subsurface structure that are consistent both with information obtained from previous experiments and with new data (the Bayesian posterior probability distribution). However, this family seldom embodies geologically reasonable images. Here we show that the posterior distribution of tomographic images obtained from travel time data can be fully geological by injecting geological prior information into Bayesian inference and that we can do this near‐instantaneously by using trained mixture density networks (MDNs). We invoke two geological concepts as prior information about the possible depositional environment of an imaged target structure: a braided river system and a set of marine parasequences. Each concept is parameterised by the latent parameters of a generative adversarial network. Data from a target structure can then be used to infer the family of compatible latent parameter values using either geological concept using MDNs. Our near‐instantaneous MDN solutions closely resemble those found using relatively expensive Monte Carlo methods. We show that while the use of incorrect geological conceptual models provides significantly less accurate results, a classifier neural network can infer which geological conceptual model is most consistent with the data. It is thus demonstrated that even apparently barely related geophysical data may contain information about abstract geological concepts, and that geological conceptual models are key to creating reasonable images from geophysical data.

Bayeslands: A Bayesian inference approach for parameter uncertainty quantification in Badlands

Surrogate-assisted Bayesian inversion for landscape and basin evolution models

A Surrogate Modelling Approach Based on Nonlinear Dimension Reduction for Uncertainty Quantification in Groundwater Flow Models

Bayesian Learning of Coupled Biogeochemical-Physical Models

Bayesian seismic inversion: a fast sampling Langevin dynamics Markov chain Monte Carlo method

Bayesian Geophysical Basin Modeling with Seismic Kinematics Metrics to Quantify Uncertainty for Pore Pressure Prediction

Inverse modeling of hydrologic parameters in CLM4 via generalized polynomial chaos in the Bayesian framework

Fully Bayesian inference for spatiotemporal data with the multi-resolution approximation

Efficiency and robustness in Monte Carlo sampling of 3-D geophysical inversions with Obsidian v0.1.2: Setting up for success

Bayesian Calibration of the Community Land Model Using Surrogates

Parameter Estimation for Infiltration in Unsaturated Soils Using a Bayesian Approach

Bayesian Modeling of Incompatible Spatial Data: A Case Study Involving Post-Adrian Storm Forest Damage Assessment

On Bayesian Modelling of the Uncertainties in Palaeoclimate Reconstruction

Bayesian Inversion, Uncertainty Analysis and Interrogation Using Boosting Variational Inference

Chilled Sampling for Uncertainty Quantification: A Motivation From A Meteorological Inverse Problem

Calibration of a Distributed Flood Forecasting Model with Input Uncertainty Using a Bayesian Framework

The research on Bayesian inference for geophysical inversion

Bayesian calibration and sensitivity analysis for a karst aquifer model using active subspaces

Introducing conceptual geological information into Bayesian tomographic imaging

Bayesian inference for geophysical fluid dynamics using generative models

Basin Analysis Palaeo‐landscape modelling: testing the critical controls using Experimental Design constrained by a real 3D geological model, Gippsland Basin, Australia