Progress of Three-Dimensional, Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Refractive Index in Biological Samples
Yang Zewen,Zhang Lu,Lu Ning,Wang Huijun,Zhang Zhenxi,Yuan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3788/CJL202249.0507201
2022-01-01
Chinese Journal of Lasers
Abstract:Significance Optical microscopic imaging is vital for observing and studying biological cells and tissues. Fluorescent probes and other chemical reagents are commonly used for exogenous labeling of cells in clinical diagnosis and biomedical research because biological samples absorb little visible light, making them colorless and translucent. Although these labeling methods can improve imaging contrast and specificity, phototoxicity destroys samples to some extent and photobleaching affects long-term observation. Furthermore, many subcellular structures, such as lipids, are extremely difficult to label, which limits labeling methods' applications. Hence, optical imaging methods for label-free samples are considered to be an important research field for simplifying the time-consuming sample preparation process and for reducing biological interference from fluorescent reagents on samples to meet clinical requirements. The interaction of light and samples can become a promising solution using an optical microscopic imaging method to obtain morphological and biological features of label-free samples. Considering light as electromagnetic waves, biological samples can be characterized by their complex refractive index. The quantitative measurement of the refractive index has experienced a long period of development as an endogenous " label" of biological samples, which includes: a) the average refractive index of a cell population suspended in a medium; b) the effective refractive index of a single cell; c) the two-dimensional (2D) refractive index mapping imaging of a single cell; and d) the three-dimensional (3D) refractive index distribution imaging of a single cell. Among them, a) and b) are not involved in the imaging process, and only one refractive index value is measured to represent a cell population or a single cell, which can provide very limited information. As a result, researchers are interested in label-free 2D imaging and 3D imaging based on a sample's refractive index. For label-free "thin" biological samples, quantitative phase imaging (QPI) is a powerful quantitative imaging method. Currently, QPI' s ability to analyze the interior information of samples can reach the diffraction limit at lateral resolution. However, because the phase results are the integral of the samples' refractive index along the light propagation direction, the 3D refractive index distribution of the samples cannot be obtained. Researchers have set label-free 3D imaging of biological samples as their next goal to obtain more accurate morphological information, such as nuclear shape, dry mass, and nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio. In recent years, optical projection tomography ( OPT) has pioneered the study of morphological feature reconstruction aiming at the 3D quantitative imaging of refractive index. However, OPT does not consider the diffraction effect, resulting in its inaccuracy. To solve this problem, based on the solution of inverse scattering, optical diffraction tomography (ODT) was developed that has shown great potential in 3D imaging of label-free biological samples. Although many corresponding advances have been made in the 3D quantitative imaging of refractive index, there are still a series of challenges in the area of improving the feasibility and performance. To rationally guide the successive development in this field, it is necessary to give a summary of existing research. Progress This study introduces research on the 3D quantitative imaging of refractive index in label-free biological samples. In Section 2, the forward measurement model from OPT to ODT is detailed. The Fourier-slice theorem in OPT (Fig. 1) is derived using the approximation of straight-line propagation of light, which relates the phase results of QPI to the refractive index of samples. After considering the diffraction effect, based on the Helmholtz equation, the Born approximation and Rytov approximation are used to obtain the Fourier diffraction theorem in ODT (Fig. 3) , which relates the scattering field to the refractive index of samples. The following inversion algorithms are guided by the two approximations. In Section 3, the inversion algorithms of 3D refractive index quantitative imaging are divided into four categories according to the progression of development. The first is a direct inversion (Fig. 4) , which obtains the 3D refractive index distribution of samples from phase or scattering field data at different angles using the Fourier-slice theorem or the Fourier diffraction theorem directly. The filtering methods ( filtering backprojection method in OPT and filtering backpropagation method in ODT) then transfer the filling of measurement information from the Fourier domain to the spatial domain to reduce the influence of interpolation artifacts. Subsequently, regularization and machine learning approaches from the optimization area are brought into ODT to overcome the approximation of " weak" scattered and " thin" samples, and obtain the refractive index of multiplescattering samples from sparse data. Section 4 summarizes the implementation methods of 3D refractive index quantitative imaging. The measurement based on the digital holographic is first explained and then the implementation methods of the sample rotation mode and incident wave rotation mode are introduced (Fig. 6) . The ODT based on partially coherent light and non-interference is then introduced. Section 5 summarizes the previous sections and puts forward the prospect of future research work. Conclusion and Prospect The use of the refractive index as an endogenous label in 3D quantitative imaging for label-free biological samples is gaining popularity. However, some of the following improvements still need to be made: 1) a more accurate scattering measurement model should be established to improve the imaging resolution at the theoretical level; 2) there is still a necessity to overcome the limitation of sparse data, develop a more effective refractive index 3D reconstruction inversion algorithm, and improve the reconstruction accuracy and calculation speed; 3) as the refractive index is nonspecific for biological features, in-depth analysis of the refractive index in samples is required. At the application level, this study requires mature equipment to advance clinical procedures. Furthermore, its applications can be expanded to other domains of study, including water environment monitoring, food safety, material characterization, virology, and single-molecule analysis.