How Smart Are `Water Smart Landscapes'?

Christa Brelsford,Joshua K. Abbott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.04593

2018-03-13

Abstract:Understanding the effectiveness of alternative approaches to water conservation is crucially important for ensuring the security and reliability of water services for urban residents. We analyze data from one of the longest-running "cash for grass" policies - the Southern Nevada Water Authority's Water Smart Landscapes program, where homeowners are paid to replace grass with xeric landscaping. We use a twelve year long panel dataset of monthly water consumption records for 300,000 households in Las Vegas, Nevada. Utilizing a panel difference-in-differences approach, we estimate the average water savings per square meter of turf removed. We find that participation in this program reduced the average treated household's consumption by 18 percent. We find no evidence that water savings degrade as the landscape ages, or that water savings per unit area are influenced by the value of the rebate. Depending on the assumed time horizon of benefits from turf removal, we find that the WSL program cost the water authority about $1.62 per thousand gallons of water saved, which compares favorably to alternative means of water conservation or supply augmentation.

Econometrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the long - term effectiveness of the "cash for grass" policy, especially the "Water Smart Landscapes" (WSL) program of the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA). Specifically, the research aims to answer the following key questions:

1. **Can the WSL program effectively reduce household water consumption?**
- The research estimates the average amount of water saved per square meter of lawn replaced with a water - saving landscape by analyzing 12 - year - long monthly household water records and using the difference - in - differences approach.

2. **Will the water - saving effect weaken over time?**
- The research investigates the long - term water - saving effects of different participation batches and whether the water - saving effect will decay over time.

3. **Does the subsidy amount affect the water - saving effect per unit area?**
- The research explores the impact of different subsidy amounts on the water - saving effect to evaluate the cost - effectiveness of the subsidy policy.

4. **What is the cost - effectiveness of the WSL program?**
- The research calculates the cost of the WSL program, that is, the cost per 1,000 gallons of water saved, and compares it with other water - saving or water - supply - increasing measures.

### Research Background

With global climate change and population growth, the problem of water shortage is becoming increasingly serious, especially in arid regions such as the southwestern United States. Traditional large - scale water conservancy infrastructure projects are costly and difficult to implement, so more and more cities are beginning to focus on coping with water shortages by improving water use efficiency. Among them, outdoor landscape water use accounts for a large proportion (about 60 - 65%) of residential water use, so water - saving measures for outdoor landscapes have become a focus.

### Research Methods

The research uses monthly water use data from 300,000 households in the service area of the Las Vegas Valley Water District, covering a 12 - year time span. Through the difference - in - differences approach, the researchers estimate the water - saving effect per square meter of lawn replacement in each season. In addition, the research also conducts an event study to verify the validity of the identification assumptions and ensure that the trends of the control group and the treatment group are similar during the pre - treatment period.

### Main Findings

- The average water consumption of households participating in the WSL program has decreased by 18%.
- There is no evidence to suggest that the water - saving effect will weaken over time.
- The subsidy amount has no significant impact on the water - saving effect per unit area.
- Depending on different revenue time ranges, the cost of the WSL program per 1,000 gallons of water saved is approximately $1.62, which is more cost - effective than other water - saving or water - supply - increasing measures.

Through these findings, the research provides valuable references for policy - makers, helping them better understand the long - term effects and cost - effectiveness of similar water - saving policies.