Abstract:Scholars in the humanities rely on carefully-constructed prose to convey ideas, while many in the sciences deploy numerical precision instead. Although university administrators often tout multi- or inter-discipinarity, it is unclear whether there is a deep understanding of how these modes of investigation are different, and how those differences might be accommodated and supported. For example, the disciplines that use numbers as a chief mode of expression were from the beginning conceived, embodied with and configured for external assessment as part of their claims to authority. As a consequence, their metrics were not designed to assess other kinds of scholarship such as that of the arts and the humanities. And, read in the opposite direction, the fact that the humanities were never customised for those numerical-based controls should not be understood as a failing of the discipline, but as an integral dimension of its distinct practice. This contribution offers a study of documentary form in the academy. The discussion will examine how scholarship in different fields came to have different formal features. It will furthermore consider what the implications of these differences are for how the disciplines are now seen and assessed. By looking to the history and traditions of different forms of scholarship, this chapter seeks to offer insight into the current debates about how productivity and impact are to be defined, marked and assessed in the academy. This chapter introduces the possibility that humanistic research might be expressed in word or wood and investigates the consequences of such a provocation. It concerns itself with select dimensions of scholarly publication that are especially apparent from a perspective across wood and word-among them, peer review, assessment, dissemination, citation and ownership. Under the intensifying exigencies of documentation, components of the written document that were once provisional become obligatory and codified through practice. The foregoing discussion of a historically informed experiment in academic publishing raises for consideration how specific practices of knowledge have been legitimised over time. The moments of friction encountered by the Cabinet, Box and Article provide clues about how certain forms of knowledge gain traction over time. Conceiving publications as unique performances of meaning may stimulate alternative strategies of assessment, interpretation and dissemination that are cognisant of—and work in concert with—the diverse forms at issue.

The user's guide project: giving experiential context to research papers

User's Guide Project: Looking Back and Looking Forward

MathGloss: Building mathematical glossaries from text

Helping students deal with Ethical Reasoning: The Proto-Guidelines for Ethical Practice in Mathematics as a deck of cards

Liber Mathematicae: A Web-Based Documentation and Collaboration Project for Mathematics

Teaching Resources for Embedding Ethics in Mathematics: Exercises, Projects, and Handouts

Manifesto for the Responsible Development of Mathematical Works -- A Tool for Practitioners and for Management

A Field Guide to Ethics in Mathematics

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

Creating a guide for reflective practice: applying Dewey’s reflective thinking to document faculty scholarly engagement

Encouraging student creativity in mathematics through 3D design and 3D printing

The design of tasks that address applications to teaching secondary mathematics for use in undergraduate mathematics courses

Technologies for "Complete, Transparent & Interactive Models of Math" in Education

Search Interfaces for Mathematicians

What is Mathematics? Perspectives Inspired by Anthropology

Teaching Pre-service Teachers to Make Digital Stories that Explain Complex Mathematical Concepts in a Real-World Context: The “Math-eo” Project, Creating “Cool New Tools”

A call for exploring mathematics education researchers’ interdisciplinary research practices

Supporting Student Competencies in Graph Reading, Interpretation, Construction, and Evaluation

MathePraxis – connecting first-year mathematics with engineering applications

Electronic Geometry Textbook: A Geometric Textbook Knowledge Management System

Point-and-write --- Documenting Formal Mathematics by Reference