Abstract:We hypothesize that sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic relatedness influence the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). To test this hypothesis, we assessed MAG recovery in three in silico microbial communities composed of 42 species with the same richness but different sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic distribution profiles using three different pipelines for MAG recovery. The pipeline developed by Parks and colleagues (8K) generated the highest number of MAGs and the lowest number of true positives per community profile. The pipeline by Karst and colleagues (DT) showed the most accurate results (~ 92%), outperforming the 8K and Multi-Metagenome pipeline (MM) developed by Albertsen and collaborators. Sequencing depth influenced the accurate recovery of genomes when using the 8K and MM, even with contrasting patterns: the MM pipeline recovered more MAGs found in the original communities when employing sequencing depths up to 60 million reads, while the 8K recovered more true positives in communities sequenced above 60 million reads. DT showed the best species recovery from the same genus, even though close-related species have a low recovery rate in all pipelines. Our results highlight that more bins do not translate to the actual community composition and that sequencing depth plays a role in MAG recovery and increased community resolution. Even low MAG recovery error rates can significantly impact biological inferences. Our data indicates that the scientific community should curate their findings from MAG recovery, especially when asserting novel species or metabolic traits. Microbial communities are incredibly diverse and play essential roles in ecosystems, from recycling nutrients to influencing climate change. We explored how the microbial community assembly can influence its species' metagenomics recovery. Specifically, we examined how the abundance of different species within a sample, the extent of DNA sequencing (sequencing depth), and the species taxonomic relatedness affect our ability to accurately reconstruct these communities. We computationally simulated three microbial communities, each composed of 42 species. These communities varied in species abundance, sequencing depth, and how closely related the species were to each other. We then applied three different computational techniques to reconstruct the original communities from the simulated sequence data. Our findings highlight the critical impact of sequencing depth and taxonomical relatedness, specifically, on accurately recovering microbial genomes. Interestingly, more sequencing does not always equate to more accurate community representation. Moreover, even a few false positives can significantly distort our interpretations of microbial diversity and function. Our research underscores the importance of carefully considering these factors in metagenomic studies to avoid misleading conclusions about microbial ecosystems. Our work contributes to refining metagenomic techniques, aiming for a more reliable and nuanced understanding of microbial life's role in our planet's health and functioning.

MicroPredict: predicting species-level taxonomic abundance of whole-shotgun metagenomic data using only 16S amplicon sequencing data

A Comparative Evaluation of Tools to Predict Metabolite Profiles From Microbiome Sequencing Data

Taxonomic classification and abundance estimation using 16S and WGS-A comparison using controlled reference samples

Meta-Apo improves accuracy of 16S-amplicon-based prediction of microbiome function

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

Metagenomic profiling pipelines improve taxonomic classification for 16S amplicon sequencing data

MegaD: Deep Learning for Rapid and Accurate Disease Status Prediction of Metagenomic Samples

A Fast Machine Learning Workflow for Rapid Phenotype Prediction from Whole Shotgun Metagenomes

Analysis of the microbiome: Advantages of whole genome shotgun versus 16S amplicon sequencing

Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction

Characterization of Shallow Whole-Metagenome Shotgun Sequencing as a High-Accuracy and Low-Cost Method by Complicated Mock Microbiomes

Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data

Prediction analysis for microbiome sequencing data

Improved Microbial Community Characterization of 16S Rrna Via Metagenome Hybridization Capture Enrichment

A multi-amplicon 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis method for improved taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities

Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences

Otu Analysis Using Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing Data

Accurate Genome Relative Abundance Estimation Based on Shotgun Metagenomic Reads

Multi-omic analysis tools for microbial metabolites prediction

Simulation of 69 microbial communities indicates sequencing depth and false positives are major drivers of bias in prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genome recovery

GBDR: a Bayesian model for precise prediction of pathogenic microorganisms using 16S rRNA gene sequences