Abstract:Sender-receiver interactions, and specifically persuasion games, are widely researched in economic modeling and artificial intelligence, and serve as a solid foundation for powerful applications. However, in the classic persuasion games setting, the messages sent from the expert to the decision-maker are abstract or well-structured application-specific signals rather than natural (human) language messages, although natural language is a very common communication signal in real-world persuasion setups. This paper addresses the use of natural language in persuasion games, exploring its impact on the decisions made by the players and aiming to construct effective models for the prediction of these decisions. For this purpose, we conduct an online repeated interaction experiment. At each trial of the interaction, an informed expert aims to sell an uninformed decision-maker a vacation in a hotel, by sending her a review that describes the hotel. While the expert is exposed to several scored reviews, the decision-maker observes only the single review sent by the expert, and her payoff in case she chooses to take the hotel is a random draw from the review score distribution available to the expert only. The expert’s payoff, in turn, depends on the number of times the decision-maker chooses the hotel. We also compare the behavioral patterns in this experiment to the equivalent patterns in similar experiments where the communication is based on the numerical values of the reviews rather than the reviews’ text, and observe substantial differences which can be explained through an equilibrium analysis of the game. We consider a number of modeling approaches for our verbal communication setup, differing from each other in the model type (deep neural network (DNN) vs. linear classifier), the type of features used by the model (textual, behavioral or both) and the source of the textual features (DNN-based vs. hand-crafted). Our results demonstrate that given a prefix of the interaction sequence, our models can predict the future decisions of the decision-maker, particularly when a sequential modeling approach and hand-crafted textual features are applied. Further analysis of the hand-crafted textual features allows us to make initial observations about the aspects of text that drive decision making in our setup.

From Outcome-Based to Language-Based Preferences

Human behaviour through a LENS: How Linguistic content triggers Emotions and Norms and determines Strategy choices

Self-interested behaviour as a social norm

Mathematical foundations of moral preferences

Language-based game theory in the age of artificial intelligence

Theories of Social Preferences Beyond Homo Economicus:A Review Based on the Experimental Economics

A mutualistic approach to morality: the evolution of fairness by partner choice

Designing a Homo Psychologicus More Psychologicus: Empirical Results on Value Perception in Support to a New Theoretical Organizational-Economic Agent Based Model

Predicting Decisions in Language Based Persuasion Games

Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

Human Choice Prediction in Language-based Persuasion Games: Simulation-based Off-Policy Evaluation

Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games

Experimental Game Theory and Behavior Genetics

GLEE: A Unified Framework and Benchmark for Language-based Economic Environments

Social Learning with Intrinsic Preferences

Social Preferences and Deliberately Stochastic Behavior

The Economics of Language: Match or Mismatch?

Outcome Context-Dependence is Not WEIRD: Comparing Reinforcement- and Description-Based Economic Preferences Worldwide.

Moral rhetoric in discrete choice models: a Natural Language Processing approach

Personal Norms — and Not Only Social Norms — Shape Economic Behavior

Do Large Language Models Learn Human-Like Strategic Preferences?