Gynecological brachytherapy hybrid training: The Tata Memorial Centre and BrachyAcademy experience
Elena Dizendorf,Supriya Chopra,Prachi Mittal,Ankita Gupta,Remi Nout,Alina Sturdza,Cyrus Chargari,Kari Tanderup,Ekkasit Tharavichitkul,Hamza Tatli,Meenakshi Jeeva,Jeevanshu Jain,Subhajit Panda,Ritu Raj Upreti,Yogesh Ghadi,Akshay Bhavke,Satish Kohle,Rajesh Bhajbhuje,Jai Prakash Agarwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.07.002
IF: 2.441
2024-09-09
Brachytherapy
Abstract:Purpose: The lack of training is a significant barrier to practicing brachytherapy (BT). Tata Memorial Centre, alongside international BT experts and BrachyAcademy, developed a hybrid gynecological BT training module. This study outlines the preparation, organization, and execution of the 2022-2023 Mumbai training, evaluates its effectiveness, and highlights areas for improvement. Materials and methods: Participants were radiation oncologists (RO) and medical physicists (MP) with experience in gynecological BT aiming to transition to image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). The training covered cervical, endometrial, vaginal, vulvar, periurethral cancers, and pelvic reirradiation. The hybrid course included online pre and postcourse homework assignments, a live workshop with hands-on training, a 6-month online follow-up, and a 12-month opportunity to share the transition experience. Results: The December 2022 Mumbai live workshop spanned 2.5 days, attracting 39 participants from 8 countries (Asia, Africa, Australia/Oceania). Feedback rated the course 9/10, with 78% fully meeting expectations. Forty-four percent suggested extending hands-on training. At the 6-month follow-up, response rates were low (33% RO, 11% MP). Among responding RO, 70% reported practice changes after attending the course, 40% implemented IGBT concepts in clinical practice, and 50% increased confidence in image-guided procedures. Overall, 45% of respondent sites could strengthen their intracavitary/interstitial program, while others faced limitations due to lack of access to advanced BT applicators. Conclusion: The hybrid gynecological BT training concept was successfully executed. Areas for improvement include extending hands-on training and enhancing participant engagement postcourse. Structured steps beyond training may be needed to improve the utilization of advanced brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.