Abstract:In this study, a Monte Carlo simulation of hepatic steatosis was developed to predict R2* and PDFF. Furthermore, effects of fat droplet morphology, fat susceptibility, fat signal model and magnetic field strength were evaluated for R2* ‐PDFF calibration. Results suggest that Monte Carlo simulations provide a new means for R2* ‐PDFF prediction, and this means can be easily generated for various regimes, for example, simulations with higher fields and different echo times, as well as correction of magnetic susceptibility measurements for iron quantification. To develop Monte Carlo simulations to predict the relationship of R2* with liver fat content at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. For various fat fractions (FFs) from 1% to 25%, four types of virtual liver models were developed by incorporating the size and spatial distribution of fat droplets. Magnetic fields were then generated under different fat susceptibilities at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, and proton movement was simulated for phase accrual and MRI signal synthesis. The synthesized signal was fit to single‐peak and multi‐peak fat signal models for R2* and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) predictions. In addition, the relationships between R2* and PDFF predictions were compared with in vivo calibrations and Bland–Altman analysis was performed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of these components (type of virtual liver model, fat susceptibility, and fat signal model) on R2* predictions. A virtual liver model with realistic morphology of fat droplets was demonstrated, and R2* and PDFF values were predicted by Monte Carlo simulations at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. R2* predictions were linearly correlated with PDFF, while the slope was unaffected by the type of virtual liver model and increased as fat susceptibility increased. Compared with in vivo calibrations, the multi‐peak fat signal model showed superior performance to the single‐peak fat signal model, which yielded an underestimation of liver fat. The R2* ‐PDFF relationships by simulations with fat susceptibility of 0.6 ppm and the multi‐peak fat signal model were R2*=0.490×PDFF+28.0 (R2=0.967 , p<0.01 ) at 1.5 T and R2*=0.928×PDFF+39.4 (R2=0.972 , p<0.01 ) at 3.0 T. Monte Carlo simulations provide a new means for R2* ‐PDFF prediction, which is primarily determined by fat susceptibility, fat signal model, and magnetic field strength. Accurate R2* ‐PDFF calibration has the potential to correct the effect of fat on R2* quantification, and may be helpful for accurate R2* measurements in liver iron overload. In this study, a Monte Carlo simulation of hepatic steatosis was developed to predict the relationship between R2* and PDFF. Furthermore, the effects of fat droplet morphology, fat susceptibility, fat signal model, and magnetic field strength were evaluated for the R2* ‐PDFF calibration. Our results suggest that Monte Carlo simulations provide a new means for R2* ‐PDFF prediction and this means can be easily generated for various regimes, such as simulations with higher fields and different echo times, as well as correction of magnetic susceptibility measurements for liver iron quantification.

Comparison of Vendor-Independent Software Tools for Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction Estimation at 1.5 T

Free-breathing liver fat quantification using a multiecho 3D stack-of-radial technique.

Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility

Estimation and Validation of Patient-Specific Liver Elasticity Distributions Derived from 4DMR for Radiotherapy Purposes

Comparison of reader agreement, correlation with liver biopsy, and time-burden sampling strategies for liver proton density fat fraction measured using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with obesity: a secondary cross-sectional study

Liver Fat Content Measurement with Quantitative CT Validated Against MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction: A Prospective Study of 400 Healthy Volunteers.

Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population

Confidence maps for reliable estimation of proton density fat fraction and R2* in the liver

Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0–100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites

Fat Quantification in Dual-Layer Detector Spectral Computed Tomography

Photon-counting CT using multi-material decomposition algorithm enables fat quantification in the presence of iron deposits

Quantitative Comparison of Liver Volume, Proton Density Fat Fraction, and Time Burden between Automatic Whole Liver Segmentation and Manual Sampling MRI Strategies for Diagnosing Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Obese Patients

Hepatic Fat Quantification With Novel Ultrasound Based Techniques: A Diagnostic Performance Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction as Reference Standard

R2* Impact on Hepatic Fat Quantification With a Commercial Single Voxel Technique at 1.5 and 3.0 T

Prediction of MRI R2* relaxometry in the presence of hepatic steatosis by Monte Carlo simulations

A meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and transient elastography in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Comparison of different MR fat quantification methods at 3.0 T in a phantom study

Photon-counting Detector CT for Liver Fat Quantification: Validation across Protocols in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Fast multi-parametric imaging in abdomen by B1+corrected dual-flip angle sequence with interleaved echo acquisition

Improved liver fat and R 2 * quantification at 0.55 T using locally low-rank denoising

Comparing ultrasound-derived fat fraction and MRI-PDFF for quantifying hepatic steatosis: a real-world prospective study