Abstract:Objectives:To examine the functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with preservation of pelvic floor stabilized structure and early elevated retrograde liberation of the neurovascular bundle (PEEL).Methods:This study was a retrospective cohort study. Between June 1, 2022, and March 20, 2023, 27 cases of RARP with PEEL and 153 cases of RARP with preservation of pelvic floor stabilized structure (PPSS) were included in this study. All patients were males, aged (62.5±5.2) years (range: 50 to 73 years). There were 18 cases of ≤T2b stage and 9 cases of T2c stage.After 1∶1 propensity score matching, the postoperative functional outcomes of 27 cases of RARP with PEEL and 27 cases of RARP with PPSS were compared. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon and included patients were clinically staged as cT1-2N0M0 without preoperative urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction. In RARP with PEEL, the prostate was cut near the midline at the front when dissecting the neurovascular bundle, dissection was performed between the visceral layer of the pelvic fascia and the prostatic fascia, preserving the parietal layer and the visceral layer of the pelvic fascia, and the neurovascular bundle was retrogradely released from the apex. The cumulative probability curve was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test was used to compare the differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare postoperative urinary continence and sexual function.Results:The recovery time of continence and potency was significantly longer in the PPSS group than in the PEEL group (all P<0.05). The continence rate of the PEEL group was significantly higher than that of the PPSS group (92.59% vs. 68.10%, P=0.026) at 3 months after surgery. The potency rate of the PEEL group was also significantly higher than that of the PPSS group (40.70% vs. 15.10%, P=0.037) at 3 months after surgery. In the univariate analysis, compared to the PPSS technique, the PEEL technique was associated with a shorter recovery time of continence ( HR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.48, P=0.027) and a shorter recovery time of potency ( HR=2.06, 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.13, P=0.042). In the multivariate analysis, the PEEL technique was an independent prognosis factor for postoperative recovery of continence ( HR=2.05, 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.17, P=0.047) and potency ( HR=3.57, 95% CI: 1.43 to 8.92, P=0.007). All the cases of the PPSS group and the PEEL group were performed successfully with negative surgical margins. Conclusion:Compared with PPSS, PEEL may be more conducive to the recovery of urinary continence and sexual function after RARP.

Integrity of prostatic tissue for molecular analysis after robotic-assisted laparoscopic and open prostatectomy

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy

RNA quality in fresh frozen prostate tissue from patients operated with radical prostatectomy

Short Interval of Biopsy to Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Does Not Render Any Adverse Effects on the Perioperative Outcomes.

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

RNA-Integrity and 8-Isoprostane Levels Are Stable in Prostate Tissue Samples Upon Long-Term Storage at -80°C

Robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatecto my：Cli nical analysis of 38 cases

Is early continence recovery related to the length of spared urethra? A prospective multicenter study comparing preoperative MRI and histologic specimen measurements after robotic radical prostatectomy

Impact of Protruded Median Lobe on Perioperative, Urinary Continence and Oncological Outcomes of Retzius-sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Intermediate-Term Oncological Outcome Assessment for Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Comparing Retzius Sparing to Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort

An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing Two Approaches of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: the Standard Technique and Retzius-sparing Technique

Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Preservation of Pelvic Stabilized Structure and Early Elevated Retrograde Liberation of Neurovascular Bundle

Evaluation of margins during radical prostatectomy: confocal microscopy vs frozen section analysis

Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Vs Open Radical Prostatectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes

The impact of surgical technique on very early functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy

Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in patients after previous transurethral prostatectomy

Effects of robotic surgery experience on open radical prostatectomy results: single centre & single surgeon experience

Integrity of the Urethral Sphincter Complex, Nerve-sparing, and Long-term Continence Status after Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Fresh tissue procurement and preparation for multicompartment and multimodal analysis of the prostate tumor microenvironment

The Efficiency and Safety of Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Single Center Experience with 1-year Follow-up

Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Vs Open Radical Prostatectomy In Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Perioperative, Functional, And Oncological Outcomes A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis