Abstract:Objective To compare the postoperative outcomes and early continence rate between conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RSRARP).Methods The date from 50 patients who underwent RSRARP and 122 patients who underwent conventional RARP between 2016 September to 2017 included study.Ninety-two patients (forty-six patients in RARP group and forty-six patients in RSRARP group) were collected by propensity-score matching which were performed using eight preoperative variables.Preoperative data of patients in RSRARP group [patients age (67.1 ± 5.7) years,BMI (24.6 ± 2.7) kg/m2,tPSA 10.7 ng/ml (0-40.7 ng/ml),Gleason score 7 points (6-9 points),prostate volume 31.9 ml (10.0-95.4 ml),ECOG score 0 points (0-1 points),urinary domain of EPIC 94.8 points (63.9-100 points),clinical stage from T1cN0 M0 to T3a N0 M0] and conventional RARP group [patients age (67.2 ± 6.7) years,BMI (25.2 ± 3.1) kg/m2,tPSA 10.7 ng/ml (0-40.7 ng/ml),Gleason score 7 points (6-9 points),prostate volume 36.8 ml (8.9-81.0 ml),ECOG score 0 points (0-1 points),urinary domain of EPIC 95.8 points (63.9-100.0 points),clinical stage from T1c N0Mo to T3a N0M0] had no significant differences.We reviewed console time,estimated blood loss,the rate of leakage,complications,average daily drainage,pathological result,continence,urinary domain of EPIC one month,two months and three months after operation.Results All 92 cases were successfully performed robotically.Mean operation time was significantly more in RARP group than in RSRARP group [(223.9 ±48.9) min vs.(198.91 ±34.2)min,P ＜ 0.05)].There was no significant difference between the postoperative data of patients in RSRARP group [estimated blood loss 200 ml (50-1 200 ml),average daily drainage 82.5 ml (11.7-571.0 ml),the rate of leakage 6％,Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ (9％),Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅱ (4％),pathological stage pT1 (2％),pT2 (52％),pT3 (46％)] and RARP group [estimated blood loss 200 ml (100-1 200 ml),average daily drainage 102.9 ml (23.3-534.7 ml),the rate of leakage 4％,Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ (9％),Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅱ (2％),pathological stage pT1 (0),pT2 (46％),pT3 (54％)] (P ＞ 0.05).Early continence rate one week and one month after surgery was significantly higher in RSRARP group than in RARP group (78％ vs.35％,91％ vs.79％,P＜0.05).Urinary domain of EPIC one month and two months after surgery was significantly more in RSRARP group than in RARP group [(91.4±8.3) vs.(84.6±10.9),(95.0±7.5) vs.(91.6±7.8),P＜0.05].There was no significant difference in the rate of positive surgical margin between RSRARP group and RARP group (22％ vs.17％,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions RSRARP were time-saving,safe and effective for the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer.It seemed to yield a better outcome regarding early return to urinary continence postoperatively.

The Efficiency and Safety of Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Single Center Experience with 1-year Follow-up

A Comparison Of Perioperative Outcome Between Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Of A Single Institution

Comparison of Robot Assistant Radical Prostatectomy by Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

Transvesical Versus Posterior Approach To Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Comparison With A 12-Month Follow-Up

Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Comparative study on the efficacy and safety of robot assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy

MP19-18 ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP) PERFORMED VIA TRANSPERITONEAL AND EXTRAPERITONEAL APPROACHES: PERIOPERATIVE AND EARLY ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES FROM A SINGLE SURGEON EXPERIENCE

Analysis of clinical effect of transperitoneal approach and extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in patients after previous transurethral prostatectomy

Application and advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer

A Comparative Study Between Retzius-sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Conventional Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Comparison of robotic-assistant laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.

Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Preliminary comparison of the modified extraperitoneal free-PORT single incision technique and transabdominal multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description

Preliminary experience of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer

Comparison of efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by the transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal procedure