Double-blind, randomized study of the anti-anginal and anti-ischaemic efficacy of fendiline and diltiazem in patients with coronary heart disease

J Schulz,E Lubnau,M Grossmann,W Rück
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1185/03007999109111663
Abstract:In a 6-week, randomized, double-blind trial, the drug effects of the calcium antagonists, fendiline (75 mg twice daily) and diltiazem (90 mg twice daily), as measured by subjective and objective parameters of coronary heart disease, were studied in 79 patients with stable angina pectoris. The statistical analysis included the data of 71 patients. The results of exercise-ECG tests showed that both medications were effective anti-ischaemic agents. Fendiline was found to be effective in reducing ST-segment depression at maximum comparable load (71 watts) as well as at the time of reaching the individual maximum tolerated load (discontinuation of exertion). Diltiazem, on the other hand, proved effective only at maximum comparable load (72 watts). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the reduction after 6 weeks. As regards work tolerance, the duration of exercise and time until appearance of a ST-segment depression of 0.1 mV, before and after treatment comparisons revealed significant changes only in the group receiving diltiazem and the differences between fendiline and diltiazem were statistically significant with regard to these three parameters. Reduction in the frequency of anginal attacks and the diminution of nitroglycerin consumption were comparable in both medication groups, and the changes from baseline were statistically significant. Assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of the medications by patients as well as by investigators revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Blood pressure and heart rate were clearly lowered by diltiazem, whereas fendiline induced only a slight decrease in blood pressure. The results indicate that both medications are equally suited for the treatment of stable angina pectoris.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?