Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures describe natural history, manage disease, and measure the effects of interventions in trials. Patients themselves increasingly use Web-based PRO tools to track their progress, share their data, and even self-experiment. However, existing PROs have limitations such as being: designed for paper (not screens), long and burdensome, negatively framed, under onerous licensing restrictions, either too generic or too specific.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate the core items of a modular, patient-centric, PRO system (Thrive) that could measure health status across a range of chronic conditions with minimal burden.METHODS: Thrive was developed in 4 phases, largely consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidance regarding PRO development. First, preliminary core items (common across multiple conditions: core Thrive items) were developed through literature review, analysis of approximately 20 existing PROs on PatientsLikeMe, and feedback from psychometric and content experts. Second, 2 rounds of cognitive interviews were iteratively conducted with patients (N=14) to obtain feedback on the preliminary items. Third, core Thrive items were administered electronically along with comparator measures, including 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF)-20 and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, to a large sample (N=2002) of adults with chronic diseases through the PatientsLikeMe platform. On the basis of theoretical and empirical rationale, items were revised or removed. Fourth, the revised core Thrive items were administered to another sample of patients (N=704) with generic and condition-specific comparator measures. A psychometric evaluation, which included both modern and classical test theory approaches, was conducted on these items, and several more items were removed.RESULTS: Cognitive interviews helped to remove confusing or redundant items. Empirical testing of subscales revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.712-.879), test-retest reliability (absolute intraclass correlations=.749-.912), and convergent validity with legacy PRO scales (eg, Pearson r=.5-.75 between Thrive subscales and PHQ-9 total). The finalized instrument consists of a 19-item core including 5 multi-item subscales: Core symptoms, Abilities, Mobility, Sleep, and Thriving. Results provide evidence of construct (content, convergent) validity, high levels of test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and the ability to detect change over time. The items did not exhibit bias based on gender or age, and the items generally functioned similarly across conditions. These results support the use of Thrive Core items across diverse chronic patient populations.CONCLUSIONS: Thrive appears to be a useful approach for capturing important domains for patients with chronic conditions. This core set serves as a foundation to begin developing modular condition-specific versions in the near future. Cross-walking against traditional PROs from the PatientsLikeMe platform is underway, in addition to clinical validation and comparison with biomarkers. Thrive is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0.

Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing

Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential

The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration

Advancing the efficiency and efficacy of patient reported outcomes with multivariate computer adaptive testing

A Rasch Measurement Theory Approach to Improve the Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes

Item response theory validation of the Oxford Knee Score and Activity and Participation Questionnaire: a step towards a common metric

A short tutorial on item response theory in rheumatology

The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Development and Validation: A Primer for Clinicians

Patient-Reported Physical Function Measures in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Psychometric properties of computerized adaptive testing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient-reported outcome measurement

Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives

A single patient reported outcome measure for acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis & Parkinson’s disease

Applying Item Response Theory to the OPD Structure Questionnaire: Identification of a Unidimensional Core Construct and Feasibility of Computer Adaptive Testing

AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics

Item Response Theory Validation of the Forgotten Joint Score for Persons Undergoing Total Knee Replacement

A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items (Preprint)

339P Exploring the content validity of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures to capture the patient experience of Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD)

Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

Using item response theory improved responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes measures in carpal tunnel syndrome

A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items