Abstract:BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures describe natural history, manage disease, and measure the effects of interventions in trials. Patients themselves increasingly use Web-based PRO tools to track their progress, share their data, and even self-experiment. However, existing PROs have limitations such as being: designed for paper (not screens), long and burdensome, negatively framed, under onerous licensing restrictions, either too generic or too specific. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and validate the core items of a modular, patient-centric, PRO system (Thrive) that could measure health status across a range of chronic conditions with minimal burden. METHODS Thrive was developed in 4 phases, largely consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidance regarding PRO development. First, preliminary core items (common across multiple conditions: core Thrive items) were developed through literature review, analysis of approximately 20 existing PROs on PatientsLikeMe, and feedback from psychometric and content experts. Second, 2 rounds of cognitive interviews were iteratively conducted with patients (N=14) to obtain feedback on the preliminary items. Third, core Thrive items were administered electronically along with comparator measures, including 20-item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF)-20 and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, to a large sample (N=2002) of adults with chronic diseases through the PatientsLikeMe platform. On the basis of theoretical and empirical rationale, items were revised or removed. Fourth, the revised core Thrive items were administered to another sample of patients (N=704) with generic and condition-specific comparator measures. A psychometric evaluation, which included both modern and classical test theory approaches, was conducted on these items, and several more items were removed. RESULTS Cognitive interviews helped to remove confusing or redundant items. Empirical testing of subscales revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=.712-.879), test-retest reliability (absolute intraclass correlations=.749-.912), and convergent validity with legacy PRO scales (eg, Pearson r=.5-.75 between Thrive subscales and PHQ-9 total). The finalized instrument consists of a 19-item core including 5 multi-item subscales: Core symptoms, Abilities, Mobility, Sleep, and Thriving. Results provide evidence of construct (content, convergent) validity, high levels of test-retest and internal consistency reliability, and the ability to detect change over time. The items did not exhibit bias based on gender or age, and the items generally functioned similarly across conditions. These results support the use of Thrive Core items across diverse chronic patient populations. CONCLUSIONS Thrive appears to be a useful approach for capturing important domains for patients with chronic conditions. This core set serves as a foundation to begin developing modular condition-specific versions in the near future. Cross-walking against traditional PROs from the PatientsLikeMe platform is underway, in addition to clinical validation and comparison with biomarkers. Thrive is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0.

The case for an international patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®) initiative

Comparable Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Across Health Conditions, Settings, and Countries: the PROMIS International Collaboration

Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing

Research progress in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration

A single patient reported outcome measure for acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis & Parkinson’s disease

Measuring what matters: Why and how to include patient reported outcomes in clinical care and research on inborn errors of metabolism

Evaluating the Population-Based Usage and Benefit of Digitally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The PROMchronic Study Protocol

Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters

Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care

A framework for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: the PROTEUS-practice guide

Improving patient reported outcomes using item response theory and computerized adaptive testing

Optimizing Measurement Potential in Mental Health Clinical Practice: The Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) study

A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items (Preprint)

Toward System-Wide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Framework for Countries, States, and Regions

Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential

Selecting patient-reported outcome measures: "what" and "for whom"

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Development and Validation: A Primer for Clinicians

Seamless Integration of Computer-Adaptive Patient Reported Outcomes into an Electronic Health Record

Translation and linguistic validation of 24 PROMIS item banks into French