Moderators of Exercise Effects on Cancer-related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data
Jonna K VAN Vulpen,Maike G Sweegers,Petra H M Peeters,Kerry S Courneya,Robert U Newton,Neil K Aaronson,Paul B Jacobsen,Daniel A Galvão,Mai J Chinapaw,Karen Steindorf,Melinda L Irwin,Martijn M Stuiver,Sandi Hayes,Kathleen A Griffith,Ilse Mesters,Hans Knoop,Martine M Goedendorp,Nanette Mutrie,Amanda J Daley,Alex McConnachie,Martin Bohus,Lene Thorsen,Karl-Heinz Schulz,Camille E Short,Erica L James,Ronald C Plotnikoff,Martina E Schmidt,Cornelia M Ulrich,Marc VAN Beurden,Hester S Oldenburg,Gabe S Sonke,Wim H VAN Harten,Kathryn H Schmitz,Kerri M Winters-Stone,Miranda J Velthuis,Dennis R Taaffe,Willem VAN Mechelen,Marie José Kersten,Frans Nollet,Jennifer Wenzel,Joachim Wiskemann,Irma M Verdonck-DE Leeuw,Johannes Brug,Anne M May,Laurien M Buffart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002154
Abstract:Purpose: Fatigue is a common and potentially disabling symptom in patients with cancer. It can often be effectively reduced by exercise. Yet, effects of exercise interventions might differ across subgroups. We conducted a meta-analysis using individual patient data of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to investigate moderators of exercise intervention effects on cancer-related fatigue. Methods: We used individual patient data from 31 exercise RCT worldwide, representing 4366 patients, of whom 3846 had complete fatigue data. We performed a one-step individual patient data meta-analysis, using linear mixed-effect models to analyze the effects of exercise interventions on fatigue (z score) and to identify demographic, clinical, intervention- and exercise-related moderators. Models were adjusted for baseline fatigue and included a random intercept on study level to account for clustering of patients within studies. We identified potential moderators by testing their interaction with group allocation, using a likelihood ratio test. Results: Exercise interventions had statistically significant beneficial effects on fatigue (β = -0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.22 to -0.12). There was no evidence of moderation by demographic or clinical characteristics. Supervised exercise interventions had significantly larger effects on fatigue than unsupervised exercise interventions (βdifference = -0.18; 95% CI -0.28 to -0.08). Supervised interventions with a duration ≤12 wk showed larger effects on fatigue (β = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.20) than supervised interventions with a longer duration. Conclusions: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, we found statistically significant beneficial effects of exercise interventions on fatigue, irrespective of demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings support a role for exercise, preferably supervised exercise interventions, in clinical practice. Reasons for differential effects in duration require further exploration.