Abstract:The term “animal welfare” is widely used to refer to an animal’s quality of life. It encompasses the following: animals should be healthy, well fed, and housed in an environment that they might themselves choose; animals should be relatively free from negative states, such as pain, fear and distress, and capable of enjoying life; and animals should be able to carry out behaviors and activities that they are strongly motivated to do (1). The public has long been concerned about the welfare of animals as illustrated by our laws to prevent animal cruelty, the existence of humane organizations funded by charitable donations, and the use of public money to fund animal use oversight bodies. Public concern for animal welfare extends to animals used for science: although studies show that the public supports animal-based research, people also want animal pain and distress to be minimized (2). In Canada, continuing improvements to the welfare of animals used in science have occurred over the past few decades partly because of the explicit adoption of a set of principles to guide the ethical evaluation of animal use. This is the “Three Rs” tenet — Replacement, Reduction and Refinement (3). The tenet is grounded in the premise that animals should be used only if a scientist’s best efforts to find a nonanimal alternative have failed, and that when animals are needed, only the most humane methods should be used on the smallest number of animals required to obtain valid information (4). Specifically, “Replacement alternatives” refers to methods that avoid or replace the use of animals in an area where animals would otherwise have been used, including both absolute replacements (replacing animals with inanimate systems, such as computer programs) and relative replacements (replacing more sentient animals, such as vertebrates, with animals that current scientific evidence indicates have a significantly lower potential for pain perception, such as some invertebrates). “Reduction alternatives” refers to any strategy that will result in fewer animals being used to obtain sufficient data to answer the research question, or in maximizing the information obtained per animal and thus potentially limiting or avoiding the subsequent use of additional animals, without compromising animal welfare. “Refinement alternatives” refers to the modification of husbandry or experimental procedures to minimize pain and distress, and to enhance the welfare of an animal used in science from the time it is born until its death (5). Today in Canada and internationally, the Three Rs ethic of animal use is an accepted part of the culture of animal-based science. In Canada, the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) is the national organization that has the responsibility for overseeing the care and use of animals in science. Through the overarching CCAC policy statement on: Ethics of animal investigation (4), the CCAC has incorporated adherence to the Three Rs tenet as the fundamental basis for the ethical oversight of scientific animal care and use. Briefly, the oversight process requires that use of animals for a scientific purpose (research, teaching, testing) is subject to review and approval by an animal care committee located at the institution where the animal use is proposed. To reflect the broader public, animal care committees are composed of not only scientists and veterinary professionals, but also non-users of animals from the local institution and community representatives. The CCAC also has a strong mandate to communicate with the Canadian public and to provide information to scientists to enable compliance with accepted standards. The CCAC has developed a new internet resource to communicate how the Three Rs tenet is implemented and to distribute related science-based resources: the “Three Rs Microsite” (5). The Microsite offers information on a wide range of topics related to Three Rs-Alternatives, for example Experimental Design, Telemetry, and Humane Killing; information on special topics such as Agricultural Research and Three Rs and Genetically Engineered Animals; plus a section with Additional Resources, including Species Specific Resources and a list of Three-Rs related journals.

Behavioral Metabolution - Metabolism Based Behavior Enables New Forms of Adaptation and Evolution

Making an escape: development and function of the Drosophila giant fibre system

The welfare of animals used in science: how the "Three Rs" ethic guides improvements.

Goniothalamin induces apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells.

An update survey of academic radiologists' clinical productivity.

Synthesis, structure and luminescence properties of two new acylamide metal-organic frameworks showing 4-connected CdSO₄ and a threefold interpenetrating dia net.

Neuronal ON/OFF Motion Detection Circuits Underlying Looming-Evoked Escape Behavior in Drosophila

Feedback inhibition by a descending GABAergic neuron regulates timing of escape behavior in Drosophila larvae

A survival-critical role for giant interneurons during predation

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor Dalpha7 is required for an escape behavior in Drosophila

Comment on the evolution of claw-like nails in callitrichids (marmosets/tamarins).

Fast deterministic construction of static dictionaries

A novel assay to evaluate action selection in escape behavior

A neuropeptidergic circuit gates selective escape behavior of Drosophila larvae

Tonically active GABAergic neurons in the dorsal periaqueductal gray control the initiation and execution of instinctive escape

A visuomotor circuit for evasive flight turns in Drosophila

Insulin Response in Patients Receiving Concentrated Infusions of Glucose and Casein Hydrolysate for Complete Parenteral Nutrition

Sustained activity in a descending neuron is associated with flight saccades in Drosophila

An intracranial dissection of human escape circuits

A population of descending neurons that regulates the flight motor of Drosophila