Abstract:Background: In epidemiology, indicators such as the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP), and synergy index (S) are commonly used to assess additive interactions between two variables. However, the results of these indicators are sometimes inconsistent in real world applications and it may be difficult to draw conclusions from them. Method: Based on the relationship between the RERI, AP, and S, we propose a method with consistent results, which are achieved by constraining e θ 3 - e θ 1 - e θ 2 + 1 = 0 , and the interpretation of the results is simple and clear. We present two pathways to achieve this end: one is to complete the constraint by adding a regular penalty term to the model likelihood function; the other is to use model selection. Result: Using simulated and real data, our proposed methods effectively identified additive interactions and proved to be applicable to real-world data. Simulations were used to evaluate the performance of the methods in scenarios with and without additive interactions. The penalty term converged to 0 with increasing λ, and the final models matched the expected interaction status, demonstrating that regularized estimation could effectively identify additive interactions. Model selection was compared with classical methods (delta and bootstrap) across various scenarios with different interaction strengths, and the additive interactions were closely observed and the results aligned closely with bootstrap results. The coefficients in the model without interaction adhered to a simplifying equation, reinforcing that there was no significant interaction between smoking and alcohol use on oral cancer risk. Conclusion: In summary, the model selection method based on the Hannan-Quinn criterion (HQ) appears to be a competitive alternative to the bootstrap method for identifying additive interactions. Furthermore, when using RERI, AP, and S to assess the additive interaction, the results are more consistent and the results are simple and easy to understand.

Missing and spurious interaction in additive, multiplicative and odds ratio models

Choosing statistical models to assess biological interaction as a departure from additivity of effects

Bootstrap method-based estimation on the confidence interval for additive interaction in cohort studies

The impact of neglected confounding and interactions in mixed-effects meta-regression

Identification of an additive interaction using parameter regularization and model selection in epidemiology

Asymmetric Independence Model for Detecting Interactions between Variables

Bayesian estimation of the measurement of interactions in epidemiological studies

Estimating and presenting hazard ratios and absolute risks from a Cox model with complex nonlinear interactions

How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

Interaction between two exposures: determining odds ratios and confidence intervals for risk estimates

Nonparametric Estimation and Testing of Interaction in Additive Models

The monotonic linear model: Testing for removable interactions.

Effects of Latent Variable Nonnormality and Model Misspecification on Testing Structural Equation Modeling Interactions

Measuring and estimating interaction between exposures on dichotomous outcome of a population

On the Ambiguity of Interaction and Nonlinear Main Effects in a Regime of Dependent Covariates

Inferring Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions in Mixtures of Exposures

Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment–covariate interaction tests

Non Proportional Odds Models are Widely Dispensable -- Sparser Modeling based on Parametric and Additive Location-Shift Approaches

Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses

A Simple Technique Assessing Ordinal and Disordinal Interaction Effects

On the estimation and interpretation of effect size metrics