Abstract:BackgroundStandard effect measures such as risk difference and attributable risk are frequently used in epidemiological studies and public health research to describe the effect of exposures. Recently, so-called impact numbers have been proposed, which express the population impact of exposures in form of specific person or case numbers. To describe estimation uncertainty, it is necessary to calculate confidence intervals for these new effect measures. In this paper, we present methods to calculate confidence intervals for the new impact numbers in the situation of cohort studies.MethodsBeside the exposure impact number (EIN), which is equivalent to the well-known number needed to treat (NNT), two other impact numbers are considered: the case impact number (CIN) and the exposed cases impact number (ECIN), which describe the number of cases (CIN) and the number of exposed cases (ECIN) with an outcome among whom one case is attributable to the exposure. The CIN and ECIN represent reciprocals of the population attributable risk (PAR) and the attributable fraction among the exposed (AFe), respectively. Thus, confidence intervals for these impact numbers can be calculated by inverting and exchanging the confidence limits of the PAR and AFe.ExamplesWe considered a British and a Japanese cohort study that investigated the association between smoking and death from coronary heart disease (CHD) and between smoking and stroke, respectively. We used the reported death and disease rates and calculated impact numbers with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. In the British study, the CIN was 6.46, i.e. on average, of any 6 to 7 persons who died of CHD, one case was attributable to smoking with corresponding 95% confidence interval of [3.84, 20.36]. For the exposed cases, the results of ECIN = 2.64 with 95% confidence interval [1.76, 5.29] were obtained. In the Japanese study, the CIN was 6.67, i.e. on average, of the 6 to 7 persons who had a stroke, one case was attributable to smoking with corresponding 95% confidence interval of [3.80, 27.27]. For the exposed cases, the results of ECIN = 4.89 with 95% confidence interval of [2.86, 16.67] were obtained.ConclusionThe consideration of impact numbers in epidemiological analyses provides additional information and helps the interpretation of study results, e.g. in public health research. In practical applications, it is necessary to describe estimation uncertainty. We have shown that the calculation of confidence intervals for the new impact numbers is possible by means of known methods for attributable risk measures. Therefore, estimated impact numbers should always be complemented by appropriate confidence intervals.

Interaction between two exposures: determining odds ratios and confidence intervals for risk estimates

Bootstrap method-based estimation on the confidence interval for additive interaction in cohort studies

Measuring and estimating interaction between exposures on dichotomous outcome of a population

Application of Flexible Matching Strategy to Detect Gene-Environment Interactions for Increasing the Study Power

Bayesian estimation of the measurement of interactions in epidemiological studies

Estimating and presenting hazard ratios and absolute risks from a Cox model with complex nonlinear interactions

Point and interval estimation of exposure effects and interaction between the exposures based on logistic model for observational studies

Choosing statistical models to assess biological interaction as a departure from additivity of effects

Moving from two- to multi-way interactions among binary risk factors on the additive scale

A Comparison of Statistical Methods for Studying Interactions of Chemical Mixtures

A general approach to detect gene (G)-environment (E) additive interaction leveraging G-E independence in case-control studies

Estimating Additive Interaction in Two-Stage Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

Semiparametric Discovery and Estimation of Interaction in Mixed Exposures using Stochastic Interventions

Estimation of exposure to toxic releases using spatial interaction modeling

Calculating confidence intervals for impact numbers

Inferring Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions in Mixtures of Exposures

Environmental Exposure Mixtures: Questions and Methods to Address Them

Challenges in interpreting results from ‘multiple regression’ when there is interaction between covariates

Combining estimates of the odds ratio: the state of the art

Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions with A Least Relative Error Approach