Abstract:The apportionment problem constitutes a fundamental problem in democratic societies: How to distribute a fixed number of seats among a set of states in proportion to the states' populations? This--seemingly simple--task has led to a rich literature and has become well known in the context of the US House of Representatives. In this paper, we connect the design of monotone apportionment methods to classic problems from discrete geometry and combinatorial optimization and explore the extent to which randomization can enhance proportionality. We first focus on the well-studied family of stationary divisor methods, which satisfy the strong population monotonicity property, and show that this family produces only a slightly superlinear number of different outputs as a function of the number of states. While our upper and lower bounds leave a small gap, we show that--surprisingly--closing this gap would solve a long-standing open problem from discrete geometry, known as the complexity of $k$-levels in line arrangements. The main downside of divisor methods is their violation of the quota axiom, i.e., every state should receive $\lfloor q_i\rfloor$ or $\lceil q_i\rceil$ seats, where $q_i$ is the proportional share of the state. As we show that randomizing over divisor methods can only partially overcome this issue, we propose a relaxed version of divisor methods in which the total number of seats may slightly deviate from the house size. By randomizing over them, we can simultaneously satisfy population monotonicity, quota, and ex-ante proportionality. Finally, we turn our attention to quota-compliant methods that are house-monotone, i.e., no state may lose a seat when the house size is increased. We provide a polyhedral characterization based on network flows, which implies a simple description of all ex-ante proportional randomized methods that are house-monotone and quota-compliant.

A 700-seat no-loss composition for the 2019 European Parliament

A power-weighted variant of the EU27 Cambridge Compromise

Allocation of seats in the European Parliament and a degressive proportionality

European Apportionment via the Cambridge Compromise

Mathematical aspects of degressive proportionality

Invariably Suboptimal - An attempt to improve the voting rules of Treaties of Nice and Lisbon

Voting in the European Union: The square root system of Penrose and a critical point

Who voted for a No Deal Brexit? A Composition Model of Great Britains 2019 European Parliamentary Elections

Dynamic adjustment: an electoral method for relaxed double proportionality

Double Majority and Generalized Brexit: Explaining Counterintuitive Results

Optimizing Districting and Seat Allocation for Enhanced Representativeness in Chile's Chamber of Deputies

Penrose voting system and optimal quota

New Combinatorial Insights for Monotone Apportionment

Square root voting in the Council of the European Union: Rounding effects and the Jagiellonian Compromise

Algorithms for Proportional Representation in Parliament in Divisor and Multiplicative Form

Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty

Structure and evolution of a European Parliament via a network and correlation analysis

Voting power in the Council of the European Union: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis

Apportionment with Weighted Seats

Computing the Margin of Victory in Preferential Parliamentary Elections

On influence and compromise in two-tier voting systems