Abstract:In this paper we consider the problem of multiple testing when the hypotheses are dependent. In most of the existing literature, either Bayesian or non-Bayesian, the decision rules mainly focus on the validity of the test procedure rather than actually utilizing the dependency to increase efficiency. Moreover, the decisions regarding different hypotheses are marginal in the sense that they do not depend upon each other directly. However, in realistic situations, the hypotheses are usually dependent, and hence it is desirable that the decisions regarding the dependent hypotheses are taken jointly. In this article we develop a novel Bayesian multiple testing procedure that coherently takes this requirement into consideration. Our method, which is based on new notions of error and non-error terms, substantially enhances efficiency by judicious exploitation of the dependence structure among the hypotheses. We prove that our method minimizes the posterior expected loss associated with a an additive "0-1" loss function, we also prove theoretical results on the relevant error probabilities, establishing the coherence and usefulness of our method. The optimal decision configuration is not available in closed form and we propose a novel and efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the purpose of optimization, which is also generically applicable to binary optimization problems. Numerical studies demonstrate that in dependent situations, our method performs significantly better than some existing popular conventional multiple testing methods, in terms of accuracy and power control. Moreover, application of our ideas to a real, spatial data set associated with radionuclide concentration in Rongelap islands yielded insightful results.

Reassessing Accuracy Rates of Median Decisions

Probabilities of true and false decisions in conformity assessment of a finite sample of items

Decision Making with Linear Constraints on Probabilities

Counterfactual risk assessments, evaluation, and fairness

Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens

Algorithmic Decision Making in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding

Non-marginal Decisions: A Novel Bayesian Multiple Testing Procedure

Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized Odds

Bayesian Inference on Multivariate Medians and Quantiles

Isospin dependence of nucleon effective mass in Dirac Brueckner-Hartree-Fock approach

Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items

Updating information based on generalized credal sets. Part 1: Finite case

Deciding Differential Privacy for Programs with Finite Inputs and Outputs

Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Optimal Transport and Conformal Prediction Sets

Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Conformal Prediction Sets

Assessing the coverage probabilities of fixed-margin confidence intervals for the tail conditional allocation

Bounded Rational Decision-Making from Elementary Computations That Reduce Uncertainty

THE ACCEPTABILITY OF REGRESSION SOLUTIONS: ANOTHER LOOK AT COMPUTATIONAL ACCURACY

Evaluating discriminatory accuracy of models using partial risk-scores in two-phase studies

Decision Making under the Exponential Family: Distributionally Robust Optimisation with Bayesian Ambiguity Sets