Abstract:Background: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has increasingly replaced traditional reconstruction methods in computed tomography (CT). The next paradigm shift in image reconstruction is likely to come from artificial intelligence, with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) solutions already entering the clinic. An enduring disadvantage to IR has been a change in noise texture, which can affect diagnostic confidence. DLR has demonstrated the potential to overcome this issue and has recently become available for dual-energy CT. Purpose: To evaluate the spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a commercially available DLR algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen and compare it to single-energy (SE) CT. Methods: An oval 25 cm x 35 cm custom-made phantom was scanned on a GE Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) at two dose levels (13 and 5 mGy) and two iodine concentrations (8 and 2 mg/mL), using three typical abdominal scan protocols: dual-energy (DE), SE 80 kV (SE-80 kV) and SE 120 kV (SE-120 kV). Reconstructions were performed with three strengths of IR (ASiR-V: AR0%, AR50%, AR100%) and three strengths of DLR (TrueFidelity: low, medium, high). The DE acquisitions were reconstructed as mono-energetic images between 40 and 80 keV. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d') were determined for the reconstructions following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 233. Results: Noise magnitude reductions (relative to AR0%) for the SE protocols were on average (-29%, -21%) for (AR50%, TF-M), while for DE-70 keV were (-28%, -43%). There was less reduction in mean frequency (fav ) for DLR than for IR, with similar results for SE and DE imaging. There was, however, a substantial change in the NPS shape when using DE with DLR, quantifiable by a marked reduction in the peak frequency (fpeak ) that was absent in SE mode. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) exhibited slight to moderate shifts towards lower spatial frequencies at the lower dose (<12% in fav ). Spatial resolution was consistently superior for DLR compared to IR for SE but not for DE. All protocols and reconstructions (including AR0%) showed decreased resolution with reduced dose and iodine concentration, with less decrease for DLR compared to IR. DLR displayed a higher d' than IR. The effect of energy was large: d' increased with lower keV, and SE-80 kV had higher d' than SE-120 kV. Using DE with DLR could provide higher d' than SE-80 kV at the higher dose but not at lower dose. Conclusions: DE imaging with DLR maintained spatial resolution and reduced noise magnitude while displaying less change in noise texture than IR. The d' was also higher with DLR than IR, suggesting superiority in detectability of iodinated contrast. Despite these trends being consistent with those previously established for SE imaging, there were some noteworthy differences. For DE imaging there was no improvement in resolution compared to IR and a change in noise texture. DE imaging with low keV and DLR had superior detectability to SE DLR at the high dose but was not better than SE-80 kV at low dose.

Admire vs. Safire: Objective comparison of CT reconstruction algorithms and their noise properties

Application of Iterative Reconstruction in Upper Limb Intravascular Fistula CT Angiography

Effect of an advanced model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on texture and visual impression of images privieded by a dual source CT scanner

Iterative reconstruction algorithm improves the image quality without affecting quantitative measurements of computed tomography perfusion in the upper abdomen

Assessment of Noise Reduction Potential and Image Quality Improvement of a New Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR-V) in Chest CT

Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep-learning based CT reconstruction algorithm.

CT coronary angiography: image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection.

Image quality in CT thorax: effect of altering reconstruction algorithm and tube load

Abdominal CT: Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques

Impact of ADMIRE on image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)

Iterative CT reconstruction in abdominal low-dose CT used for hybrid SPECT-CT applications: effect on image quality, image noise, detectability, and reader’s confidence

Spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen

Can Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative (SAFIRE) Reconstruction Improve Imaging Quality on Low-Dose Lung CT Screening Compared with Traditional Filtered Back Projection (FBP) Reconstruction?

Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms

Comparison of image quality based on deep-learning image reconstruction and iterative reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT: a phantom and animal-model study

A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.

Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques in Brain CT

Impact of Preset and Postset Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V on Image Quality in Nonenhanced Abdominal-Pelvic CT on Wide-Detector Revolution CT.

Application of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique in low-dose lung CT screening

Evaluation Of Dose Reduction And Image Quality In Chest Ct Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction With The Same Group Of Patients

Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan