Abstract:We introduce a novel definition for a small set R of k points being "representative" of a larger set in a metric space. Given a set V (e.g., documents or voters) to represent, and a set C of possible representatives, our criterion requires that for any subset S comprising a theta fraction of V, the average distance of S to their best theta*k points in R should not be more than a factor gamma compared to their average distance to the best theta*k points among all of C. This definition is a strengthening of proportional fairness and core fairness, but - different from those notions - requires that large cohesive clusters be represented proportionally to their size. Since there are instances for which - unless gamma is polynomially large - no solutions exist, we study this notion in a resource augmentation framework, implicitly stating the constraints for a set R of size k as though its size were only k/alpha, for alpha > 1. Furthermore, motivated by the application to elections, we mostly focus on the "ordinal" model, where the algorithm does not learn the actual distances; instead, it learns only for each point v in V and each candidate pairs c, c' which of c, c' is closer to v. Our main result is that the Expanding Approvals Rule (EAR) of Aziz and Lee is (alpha, gamma) representative with gamma <= 1 + 6.71 * (alpha)/(alpha-1). Our results lead to three notable byproducts. First, we show that the EAR achieves constant proportional fairness in the ordinal model, giving the first positive result on metric proportional fairness with ordinal information. Second, we show that for the core fairness objective, the EAR achieves the same asymptotic tradeoff between resource augmentation and approximation as the recent results of Li et al., which used full knowledge of the metric. Finally, our results imply a very simple single-winner voting rule with metric distortion at most 44.

The Expanding Approvals Rule: Improving Proportional Representation and Monotonicity

Committee Monotonic Proportional Representation: A New Voting Rule and Impossibility Results

Representing the Insincere: Strategically Robust Proportional Representation

Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selection

Proportionality and the Limits of Welfarism

Fair votes in practice

Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Making

Perpetual Voting: The Axiomatic Lens

Proportionally Representative Participatory Budgeting with Ordinal Preferences

Approval-Based Voting with Mixed Goods

Proportionally Representative Participatory Budgeting: Axioms and Algorithms

Approval-based apportionment

Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting

Proportionality in Approval-Based Participatory Budgeting

Candidate Monotonicity and Proportionality for Lotteries and Non-Resolute Rules

Multiwinner Approval Rules as Apportionment Methods

Completing Priceable Committees: Utilitarian and Representation Guarantees for Proportional Multiwinner Voting

Proportionality for Constrained Public Decisions

Achieving fully proportional representation: Approximability results

Most Equitable Voting Rules