Abstract:The question of whether people's experience in the world shapes conceptual representation and lexical semantics is longstanding. Word-association, feature-listing and similarity rating tasks aim to address this question but require a subjective interpretation of the latent dimensions identified. In this study, we introduce a supervised representational-alignment method that (i) determines whether two groups of individuals share the same basis of a certain category, and (ii) explains in what respects they differ. In applying this method, we show that congenital blindness induces conceptual reorganization in both a-modal and sensory-related verbal domains, and we identify the associated semantic shifts. We first apply supervised feature-pruning to a language model (GloVe) to optimize prediction accuracy of human similarity judgments from word embeddings. Pruning identifies one subset of retained GloVe features that optimizes prediction of judgments made by sighted individuals and another subset that optimizes judgments made by blind. A linear probing analysis then interprets the latent semantics of these feature-subsets by learning a mapping from the retained GloVe features to 65 interpretable semantic dimensions. We applied this approach to seven semantic domains, including verbs related to motion, sight, touch, and amodal verbs related to knowledge acquisition. We find that blind individuals more strongly associate social and cognitive meanings to verbs related to motion or those communicating non-speech vocal utterances (e.g., whimper, moan). Conversely, for amodal verbs, they demonstrate much sparser information. Finally, for some verbs, representations of blind and sighted are highly similar. The study presents a formal approach for studying interindividual differences in word meaning, and the first demonstration of how blindness impacts conceptual representation of everyday verbs.

Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: Evaluation and Modelling of Verbal Associations

Automatically Inferring Gender Associations from Language

Exploring Human Gender Stereotypes with Word Association Test.

Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Context

Gender Stereotypes in Natural Language: Word Embeddings Show Robust Consistency Across Child and Adult Language Corpora of More Than 65 Million Words

Robustness and Reliability of Gender Bias Assessment in Word Embeddings: The Role of Base Pairs

Unveiling Gender Bias in Large Language Models: Using Teacher's Evaluation in Higher Education As an Example

Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semantics

Gendered Representations in Language: A Corpus-Based Comparative Study of Adjective-Noun Collocations for Marital Relationships

Human Associations Help to Detect Conventionalized Multiword Expressions

Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites

Gender Bias in Decision-Making with Large Language Models: A Study of Relationship Conflicts

Women Are Beautiful, Men Are Leaders: Gender Stereotypes in Machine Translation and Language Modeling

Words Can Shift: Dynamically Adjusting Word Representations Using Nonverbal Behaviors

A Computational Evaluation of Gender Asymmetry in Semantic Change

Angry Men, Sad Women: Large Language Models Reflect Gendered Stereotypes in Emotion Attribution

Examining the Presence of Gender Bias in Customer Reviews Using Word Embedding

Computational Modeling of Stereotype Content in Text

Identifying and interpreting non-aligned human conceptual representations using language modeling

(Hu)man-Like Robots: The Impact of Anthropomorphism and Language on Perceived Robot Gender

Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts